This year, Fashuo recruited about 200 people, which was the same as last year; The number of applicants is about 1200, compared with more than 1600 last year, and the number has decreased. According to the retest line published by the school, it is estimated (personally) that the retest scores this year are 55 (57 last year), 55, 90, 90 and 335. In view of the fact that it is very late for Wuhan University to announce the retest line, if some students have low scores, please contact them as soon as possible to avoid being late.
The second interview is divided into oral English (note: Wu Da doesn't take listening test) and professional course interview, accounting for 10% and 30% of the total score respectively (60% of the initial test). Oral English lottery is a very simple question. For example, why did you apply for Wuhan University Law School? What do you think English is helpful for studying law? What do you think of the laws in China? Wait a minute. Don't worry too much, the teachers are all very good. I remember last year, one of our classmates answered questions directly in Chinese (he told the teacher that he couldn't answer in English) and was finally admitted, haha.
Let's talk about professional course interviews (or questions to be answered by drawing lots), which are mainly the contents of the guide, but some of them are not in the guide, which is unlucky. Last year, the topic I drew was: What are the constitutive elements of transformed robbery? The topic is simple. The answer was quickly answered, and then the teacher asked a related question, which was also very simple. But it may be too simple, so the score is not very high. I collected the following questions about my other classmates' professional courses, which are now sorted out as follows: the difference between deposit and liquidated damages; What is trusteeship? The significance of legal interpretation; The difference between criminal object and object; What is defect warranty; Social function and normative function of law; The effectiveness and validity of the law; The concepts and meanings of the first human right, the second human right and the third human right in the Constitution; Constitutional amendment; The difference between the crime of misappropriating public funds and the crime of misappropriating funds: Why does the Constitution stipulate social morality? On the five-power constitution: The role of constitutional interpretation and revision in constitutional reform; The background and characteristics of the revision of the Laws of the Qing Dynasty: the difference between perverting the law and abusing power; Indirect agents and subcommittees; Constitutional litigation and constitutional supervision; On the perfection of NPC supervision system: the effect of collusion hypocrisy (note: it is the topic of civil law, in fact, it refers to defects, see Yu Nengbin's Civil Law, People's Court Press); The relationship between law and religion; The relationship between criminal intentional expression and criminal intentional expression; The effectiveness of the law on regional national autonomy and local regulations; Classification of laws; Mortgage of lease contract; Ownership change; How to protect the rights and interests of migrant workers; Legal rules and logical structure; Subject qualification for declaring death. . . . . . Wait a minute.
Personally, I feel that the second interview of Wu Da is still very fair, and the result came out the next day. Of course, if you have connections, you can get free money. It doesn't matter. Just prepare for the second interview carefully. The re-examination teachers are all well-known professors, generally doctoral supervisors, such as Professor Yu Yanman, Professor Wen Shiyang and Professor Lin in our group. And teachers generally don't embarrass their classmates. Last year, 239 people were retested, and 205 people were finally admitted. The highest score is 372. There is no discrimination against students with the same academic ability. Most of the students I met in the second interview didn't brush them. Fa Shuo Tian Xia, Tian Xia Fa Shuo/Fa Shuo Postgraduate Blog
In fact, the outside world says that the re-examination of Wu Da is unfair, so don't believe it too much. In fact, this situation will happen in every school. I think at least the students we admitted have a good evaluation of Wu Da. The law school ranks third in the country, with more than 50 doctoral supervisors. The learning atmosphere is very good, and there is no feeling of discriminating against LLM.
I hope you will carefully prepare for the second interview, and I hope to meet you in September this year.
Fa Shuo Tian Xia, Tian Xia Fa Shuo/Fa Shuo Postgraduate Blog
Collection 2: Fashuo World, Fashuo/Fashuo Graduate Blog
I was admitted to the Master of Laws of Wuhan University this year, and I would like to tell you about the re-examination here, hoping to help friends who are interested in applying for Wuhan University and passed the preliminary examination at that time.
First, the second interview of Wuhan University is fair, at least I haven't found anything unfair.
Second, Wuhan University attaches great importance to the second interview. This can be seen from the proportion of his retest results.
Third, I didn't find any discrimination in Wuhan University, regardless of your recent graduates, junior college graduates, equivalent education, after-work exams, or whether the school you graduated from is a prestigious school. Will be treated the same.
Fourth, Wuhan University is really beautiful. Cherry blossoms, mountains (Luojia Mountain), water (East Lake) and old buildings are really rich. Fa Shuo Tian Xia, Tian Xia Fa Shuo/Fa Shuo Postgraduate Blog
The specific re-examination situation is as follows:
The second interview is divided into oral English and listening and professional course interviews.
First, English is the best in the world, and Fashuo/Fashuo postgraduate blogs are the best in the world.
Time: not less than 5 minutes (in fact, there are cases where it is less than 5 minutes).
Form: talk to the teacher.
Procedure: Take a question first, and then express it according to the question you take, which is a bit like the feeling of oral composition. After the demonstration, the teacher will ask some questions The question I know is:
Introduce your family, your university, your undergraduate major, describe the type of university teachers you like, why do you want to study law, why do you want to apply for Wuhan University, and what to do if you fail? Talk about your views on law education in China, your hobbies, etc. Bottom line: It's all simple, really. Also, the oral and listening tests don't look at the content of the questions you answer, that is, it doesn't matter whether the answers you answer match the questions he asks, as long as you can express your views in English. Generally speaking, there are many repetitions of topics. However, different examination rooms are different. A topic in my examination room is repeated four times at most.
By the way, two examiners are teachers, and one teacher is in charge of score statistics.
Second, the professional course Fa Shuo ranks first in the world, and Fa Shuo/Fa Shuo graduate blog ranks first in the world.
Time: not less than 20 minutes (the students in front of the interview may have a long time, and the students behind them have a short time. I only know that it only takes 5 minutes)
Tables: Select a topic
Procedure: Choose a topic first (you can prepare your selected topic when your former classmate is interviewing, and how long it will take him to interview) and discuss your selected topic. After the discussion, the teacher will ask many questions.
In most cases, the teacher will ask questions according to your argument, so you'd better be strict with your argument and don't leave the teacher an opportunity to attack you. Of course, as long as you can justify yourself, your mind is free, but you still have to say something, even a little.
There are many examiners, at least six (sorry, I didn't care about this at that time, I was too nervous).
The selected topics are generally not repeated, but there are overlaps between different examination rooms, which are generally rare.
Under normal circumstances, there are two kinds of questions: especially simple, you can find the answer directly in the textbook. It will be easier to discuss this topic, but there must be no mistakes in the discussion, otherwise it will be unreasonable. After the discussion, the teacher will ask a slightly more difficult question than the topic you chose. Otherwise, it will be cheaper for you, hehe. The other is more difficult. There are no ready-made answers in the book. You should discuss it according to your own understanding, as long as it is reasonable. If you answer well, the teacher will especially appreciate you, and this kind of topic will give students a lot of room to play. Can show understanding. Don't confine your discussion to books, you can combine it with reality, and make the teacher feel that you have a wide range of knowledge and know a lot, and you are not that kind of dead learning.
The topics of professional courses are not listed here, because there are too many, a total of five courses. If you know anything, I hope you can add it below. I remember my topic is: the role of legislation in protecting human rights.
Special reminder: Fa Shuo Tian Xia, the blog of Fa Shuo/Fa Shuo graduate students in the world.
First, out of politeness, I won't say much about this.
Second, it is best to dress formally. I don't mean that you must wear formal clothes, but you can't be too casual, because the profession of legal person is different from that of literati and artists.
Don't be silent when you encounter problems that can't be solved. On the one hand, you can talk about your own understanding. On the other hand, you can ask the teacher to give you some hints and be sincere. Besides, if not, you can change the subject. I heard that changing one will reduce 5 points, but none of my classmates changed the topic.
Fourth, don't be too nervous. It's really unnecessary. The teachers there are very good. They tell you not to be nervous.