The form of civil service examination interview is mainly structured interview, and some positions will be interviewed by leaderless groups.
Structured interview, also known as standardized interview, is relative to the traditional experience interview. It refers to an interview method in which questions are asked one by one according to the pre-established interview outline, and the interviewer's answers are recorded in a standard format and evaluated according to certain methods and standards. Because it strictly follows specific procedures, the interview results are more accurate and reliable. In short, structured interviews include the structuring of interview procedures, interview questions and interview evaluation.
Leaderless group discussion is mainly to give a group of candidates (usually 5-7 people) a work-related question, so that candidates can discuss it freely. The time is generally 1 hour. Evaluators do not set special roles for candidates, nor do they specify who is the leader, nor do they specify where everyone should sit. Instead, all candidates are allowed to rank and organize themselves. The evaluator only arranges the activities of the candidates and observes the performance of each candidate.
Second, the interview process
Candidates are sure to participate in the interview process: (1) telephone interview; (2) Prepare relevant documents for qualification examination; (3) the voucher of the interview day enters the examination room; (4) sign in and hand in communication tools; (5) draw lots; (6) Waiting for the exam.
Structured interview process: (1) Admission of candidates. (2) There are generally two forms for candidates to answer questions: the question book and the examiner's marking. The interview is usually 3-4 questions, and the time is usually 15-20 minutes. (3) Candidates leave their jobs. At the end of the interview, the examiner announced the candidates' withdrawal. (4) scoring. The examiner scores according to the candidates' performance, and the examiner signs the report card.
Interview process of leaderless group: (1) Admission of candidates. Guided by the staff, queue up for admission, and candidates are seated as required. (2) reading materials. Candidates read the material and prepare to speak. (3) personal statement. The interviewer reads the introduction, and the candidates think and prepare according to the tips and requirements of the introduction. After the reflection time, the candidate makes a personal statement and expounds his own views. (4) Free discussion. At this stage, candidates can freely participate in the discussion, express their opinions and put forward suggestions to solve problems. During the period, the interviewer only observed each candidate and scored according to the scoring standard, and did not participate in the discussion or give any form of guidance. (5) summary statement. After the discussion, a group representative will be produced to summarize and state the views on behalf of the group. (6) Candidates exit. At the end of the interview, the examiner announced the candidates' withdrawal, and the candidates withdrew as required. (7) scoring. Examiners score according to the candidates' performance, and the examiners sign the report card.
Third, the interview test center
In the interview, the examiner should grade the evaluation factors of the candidates, which mainly include the following aspects.
1, comprehensive analysis. Be able to accurately understand and grasp the essence and internal relations of things and solve problems through inductive and deductive reasoning processes.
2. Oral expression. For different audiences, express your thoughts and opinions clearly in words, which is convenient for the audience to accept. Accurate wording, smooth expression, appeal and persuasion are required.
3. Planning and organization. Be able to plan the activities of oneself, others and departments according to the objectives, allocate resources and effectively coordinate the parties to the conflict.
4, strain. In the case of great pressure, when thinking and solving problems, you can quickly and flexibly change your perspective, improvise and make correct judgments and treatments.
5. Awareness and skills of interpersonal cooperation. This paper mainly examines the ability of candidates to establish their own relationships with others and groups purposefully, and to effectively expand the scope of interpersonal communication on the basis of maintaining benign interpersonal relationships.
6. The matching between job-seeking motivation and the proposed position. It mainly examines whether the candidates' motivation for applying for the exam is clear, whether their personal conditions and wishes are consistent with the positions they apply for, and whether they are honest and responsible in answering questions.
7. communication. Understand others accurately, express yourself clearly and influence others effectively.
8. Manners. It mainly examines the candidates' appearance, temperament, clothes and manners, mental state, etc. See if they dress appropriately, whether their words and deeds conform to the general etiquette, and whether there are redundant actions. Research shows that people who behave in a dignified, clean and civilized manner generally have rules and principles, pay attention to self-discipline and have a strong sense of responsibility.
9. Access to information. Be able to get key information from the topic and make accurate judgments based on the information.
10, active. Can actively promote the work and make the work develop in a better direction.
1 1, self-emotional control. This paper mainly examines whether candidates' expressions and words are natural under strong stimulation, whether they can remain calm under intentional challenge or even humiliation, whether they can remain restrained, tolerant and rational in the face of superior criticism, work pressure or personal interests, whether they are not affected by emotional fluctuations, and whether they have patience and tenacity in their work.
12, professional. Be able to analyze and solve problems from a professional perspective, and have the professional quality required for the post.