In the previous interview, Gong said that the fat content is very low, so it is not suitable for high-intensity training. Once qi zhou's physical fitness declines, there will be problems of slow movement and decreased reaction ability. ".
Unfortunately, Gong was right. In this World Cup, Li Nan brought Yi Jianlian, qi zhou and Wang Zhelin. But with five point guards, in fact, with Li Nan's conservative employment strategy, he wouldn't use so many point guards. In the match against C? te d 'Ivoire, Sun Minghui didn't get playing time, while in the match against Poland, Fang Shuo did quite badly, so he might as well not play.
When Zhou Peng retired from the national team, the voice of Shen Zijie's return to the national team was still quite high, because China was still a traditional team dominated by insiders. Li Nan also likes to use the Twin Towers lineup, so it is necessary to prepare an inside man, but Li Nan insists on bringing five defenders.
What happened later was that qi zhou had a cramp in his leg 33 minutes after the first game. Obviously, in the high-intensity competition, qi zhou's physical fitness dropped quite seriously. In the match against Poland, the consequence of qi zhou's physical decline was that the defensive end acted excessively, which led to defensive fouls and continuous serve-in-line errors.
All these are directly related to the way of employing people in Li Nan. Compared with Gong, it is far behind in this respect. I have been with Gong for so many years, but I haven't learned the core thing in Gong's coaching process. He lags far behind Gong.
This should be a sure-fire game. At the last moment, qi zhou's mistakes and Li Nan's command mistakes caused the China men's basketball team to lose a wonderful game. Qi zhou's mistake may confuse some fans, but in my opinion, it was the head coach's last-minute decision-making mistake. In fact, when I was interviewed by Gong before, I made it very clear. Gong Kao: "qi zhou is not suitable for high-intensity training because of its low fat content. Once qi zhou's physical fitness declines, there will be problems such as slow movement and decreased responsiveness. "
Qi zhou played the game for 29 minutes. In such a fierce competition, qi zhou's physical fitness has appeared serious problems. At the last moment, qi zhou's unconscious foul was an excessive act of physical decline and insufficient confrontation. There are also continuous service mistakes, which also reflects the decline of reaction ability. When Li Nan decided on the list, it was controversial to bring only three insiders. Qi zhou's mistake in this game seems accidental, but it is inevitable. If Li Nan had been more knowledgeable and made good use of people, I don't think qi zhou would have made a series of mistakes.
After following Gong for many years, Gong did not learn how to make good use of people. The first is the use of Guo. Gong has always put Guo on the use of the sixth person. I think this way can give full play to Guo's characteristics. Secondly, it is used, and the palace is very targeted in the rotation. In contrast, Li Nan is too conservative in employing people, and every time he changes people, he is very passive. Moreover, at the last minute, he helped his opponent to pause, which directly ruined the game, not to mention the palace. I think any CBA coach is better than Li Nan!
Because we have a great chance to win the game. We made a low-level mistake because of the critical moment. Because the execution is not enough, because the technical and tactical arrangements of the head coach are not so perfect. A stone stirs up a thousand waves. After the game, all the accusations were directed at the head coaches Li Nan and qi zhou, who made mistakes at the last minute.
People began to question the employment situation in Li Nan. People began to question the feasibility of Li Nan's tactical arrangement at the critical moment. People began to think of the men's basketball team that led China to Asia again a few years ago. Director: Gong. He is a meritorious player and head coach in the history of basketball in China. In the hearts of Chinese people and fans, it left a deep imprint. At this moment, China fans began to miss the old man.
In fact, people began to question Li Nan's guidance from the beginning of selecting the training list. His indecision about the athletes. And the use of players have caused dissatisfaction among many fans. Coupled with last night's game, as the head coach, he failed to arrange the perfect tactics. There have been several strange moments called pauses. An incomprehensible arrangement. People began to guess. Will Li Nan still be the head coach of China men's basketball team after the World Cup?
In any case, in fact, that moment is the result of the dust settled. For us, for the China men's basketball team, they should put it down for a while. We should learn from last night. Adjust yourself to better face tomorrow's game. Tomorrow's game is a life-and-death battle for us, a life-and-death battle. We must win it to have a chance to advance 16. Have a chance to advance.
At this moment, we should give some guidance to China Men's Basketball Team and Li Nan. Give them trust and encouragement, because the game is not over yet. Such a result is unacceptable to anyone. But then. After the pain really arrival on us. We should analyze rationally and change rationally. Only by finding and solving problems can we grow step by step. In order to become a stronger self. Become a stronger China men's basketball team.
I hope that in tomorrow's game, they can stand on the basketball court with more confidence and perfection. I hope they won't make such low-level mistakes again. I hope their execution at the critical moment can be greatly improved. Come on, China Men's Basketball Team.
Qi zhou's mistake stems from his lack of concentration, free will and lack of competition experience at the critical moment, which led to the great situation that China men's basketball team regretted losing. Although Gong, the former head coach of the men's basketball team, once commented on the Demon King: "qi zhou is not suitable for high-intensity training because of its low fat content. Once qi zhou's physical fitness declines, there will be problems such as slow movement and decreased responsiveness. "
Although Gong said so, his performance on the court mainly depends on the players' improvisation. At such a critical moment, qi zhou was not agile enough, his attention was not focused, and he didn't concentrate on the game wholeheartedly. As a result, the sideline service error gave the opponent a chance to steal and successfully made a foul. Under unfavorable circumstances, the game was put into overtime, and the China men's basketball team won.
Of course, back to the head coach level, Li Nan is too rigid and inflexible in guiding and employing people. Don't use it before Guo 5 criminals leave. The striker doesn't consider Abdul Salamu and Columbeck at all. He only knows that Zhai Xiaochuan still doesn't dare to change players on the spot even if the latter has leg discomfort. So where are their roles in the World Cup?
On the other hand, although Gong has some temper, at least he can make good use of players and has rich experience and tactics. Giving full play to the role of players on the court is not as conservative as Li Nan's guidance, especially the improper use of penalty tactics has been criticized. Li Nan's guidance also needs to pay his own "tuition" for the failure of the men's basketball team, and also needs to accumulate more experience and tactics.
Li Nan is a novice coach! 14 minutes Guo 5 criminals; Assign Li, pass the ball and break through; Abdul should be rotated, the Koran; Finally, the March stopped for about 10 seconds, and time ran out to win! Guo should not play until the end of the fourth quarter after committing three crimes. He is well rested, emotionally stable and has a basket! That's how Guo Shiqiang used it. Study! Everything you have learned is alive! Can't blame qi zhou for making him take it? It's all the incompetence of the coach! * * * Encourage!
Facing the powerful Polish team, the China men's basketball team fought for the whole game, but qi zhou made frequent mistakes at the last minute. Of course, this can't be entirely attributed to the players, but qi zhou's mistakes are really inappropriate to the outside world! Contrary to most fans' criticism of qi zhou, the cohesion of the China men's basketball team is still very strong, and the players are very United, especially the comments made by the captain and core Yi Jianlian on the social platform after the game, which has driven the whole team to support qi zhou!
However, judging from the post-match situation, qi zhou's mistakes are frequently related to his poor performance, the head coach's mistakes in arranging tactics, and, of course, too few inside players when the head coach selects candidates! Gong, the former head coach of the men's basketball team, once said that the fat content is low and it is not suitable for high-intensity training. Once qi zhou's physical fitness declines, there will be problems such as slowness and decreased responsiveness. Li Nan, as the head coach, should be aware of this. He continued to arrange qi zhou to serve, even though he made a serve mistake.
It turns out that in the last 7.2 seconds, the China men's basketball team has successfully served in the backcourt. At that time, leading by 65,438+0 points, Li Nan actually called a timeout for his opponent. He is already waiting for the time to run out, or waiting for the opponent to foul! This pause is a little unhelpful! There is also a decision-making mistake, that is, the only rotation personnel in it are the United Arab League, qi zhou and Wang Zhelin, and they all consume a lot of energy. In addition, both the United Arab League and Lin are troubled by fouls. Other players who can play the fourth position, such as Abdul Salamu, have little playing time, which makes people feel conservative again!
In addition, there is the use of Clark. If we just let him make up numbers instead of using them, why not bring an extra insider? Can Shen Zijie play for at least a few minutes and contribute several fouls? Compared with Gong, it is obviously not as good as his predecessor or teacher. Gong used to be an assistant coach, and Gong was also bold and cautious in employing people. For example, he knows Guo's characteristics very well, so he didn't let him start!
Although Gong was controversial when he was in office, he was purposeful in the use of players, but he was stubborn and conservative. Excellent performance as a substitute last night, Guo didn't get a chance to play until he was sent off for an accident! Li Nan himself chose 12, but why are so many players not used on the bench? When it comes to the strength and level of players, there is actually not much difference in other positions except the particularly prominent United Arab League. Instead of using exhausted people, send a new force to rush! what do you think?
I just want to ask: How did coach Li Nan become the head coach of the national team? Did he coach CBA? What kind of resume have you had in your coaching career? This is a competition representing a country! Can't the coach be used more carefully?
Gong: qi zhou is not suitable for high-intensity training because of its low fat content. Once qi zhou's physical fitness declines, there will be problems such as slowness and decreased responsiveness. In fact, this sentence is just a polite remark. In the last 40 seconds against Poland, qi zhou's offensive foul and two throw-in balls were not physical problems at all, and had nothing to do with his limbs. It is what hangs around his neck that determines his actions. He is empty there, how can he not make mistakes!
Qi zhou didn't play for a few minutes in the Rockets. As a result, he not only sent the ball to his teammates, but also made five embarrassing things about O 'Neill. So it has nothing to do with physical strength, but with his attitude and concentration. It doesn't matter anyway, so it doesn't matter. In the NBA, he doesn't care that he doesn't care, only that his career is ruined. But in the national team, he represents the whole country and hundreds of millions of China fans. As a result, he is still so indifferent. Such an attitude at this time deserves the fans to scold him!
20 13, China men's basketball coach yannakis stubbornly used the old-fashioned lineup. As a result, in the final of the Asian Championship 1/4, China lost to Taiwan Province Province of China by 78: 96. Later, the Men's Association fired Yang Najis and promoted Gong, who instructed young people (Guo et al. ), let us China men's basketball team return to the first place in Asia. It can be said that Gong's coaching has played an important role in China men's basketball team.
Although he studied under Gong, he didn't understand the essence. He is too rigid in employing people and has poor ability to improvise. For example, in this national team, he did not use Sun Minghui, but stubbornly used Fang Shuo, and he was also very cautious when using the Koran, Ren Junfei and Abu. Qi zhou made a mistake in serving for the first time, and even insisted that Zhou Qifa play the second game, which showed that he trusted the players too much and didn't know them well enough.
Tactically, in the last 7.6 seconds, China led by one point with the ball. He even called a time-out, which shows that he is too conservative and has poor improvisation ability, and it is simply stupid to fight with his opponent at the last minute. It can be seen from these that he is really far from coach Gong!
God operates! The first time I saw a team leading, the ball took the initiative to pause to save time for the opponent! The duck that reached the mouth flew away like this. No wonder the fans will vent their anger at losing the game on the head coach, and will be shocked to show the players' mistakes in front of the fans for 7.2 seconds, but in fact, the fundamental problem is the lack of coaching experience and tactical mistakes of the head coach.
First, let's look at 7.2 seconds. Li Nan made several mistakes in succession. What is the cause of the mistake?
The first mistake, when we were three points ahead, our opponent gave us a foul tactic. It is reasonable to say that the foul tactics are indeed conservative and safe, but the fact is that there were still 10 seconds. You should at least let your opponent dribble for a few seconds before committing a foul! If the opponent keeps receiving the serve, you will foul, fearing that the watch will not stop;
The second mistake, after the opponent scored 2 goals, the score was chased to 1 point. At that time, the opponent was a little slack, and we also successfully served the baseline ball. It stands to reason that more than 7 seconds, we just hold the ball in the backcourt, and the backcourt is not afraid of overtime! Even if you stay where you are and wait for a foul, this is a good tactic. Because the ball finally served. But Li Nan chose to call a time-out, which showed his inexperience and tactical conservatism.
The third mistake is to continue to arrange qi zhou's service. At the critical moment, qi zhou has made a serve mistake, but it is unreasonable that he still chose to let qi zhou leave. Secondly, when arranging the service tactics, in order to prevent the opponent from breaking the ball, the coach usually chooses a big player to cooperate with the catch, but we choose Zhao Rui to catch the ball, and the result is broken.
As Gong commented: "qi zhou is not suitable for high-intensity training because of its low fat content. Once qi zhou's physical fitness declines, there will be problems such as slow movement and decreased responsiveness. " This sentence is enough to show his in-depth understanding of the players, at least in this respect, it is not as good as Gong, not to mention the gap in tactics and experience. Last night, I saw a detail, Li Nan suspended the arrangement, and basically no players played!
Last night's game against Poland was considered a wonderful game. When I paused, I saw the last 56 seconds of overtime, so I turned off my cell phone and went straight to sleep because I knew I would lose. The chance of victory appeared many times, but we failed to seize it. I don't want to blame anyone. After all, we have worked hard. I just want to talk about some problems in the competition. One is the problem of qi zhou. Today, qi zhou has become the target of public criticism, and has become the "Mr. Key" of the China team. In fact, qi zhou played well from the beginning. After the Polish team caught up with the score, qi zhou had several good chances, but our defender didn't pass the ball to him, but attacked at will, which made him unable to score for a long time. At this time, his mentality began to change, and foreigners commented very well: he was like a child who had not grown up. This is also an important reason to prevent qi zhou from becoming a core player or superstar. His IQ is too low, and his mind and mentality are immature, which is also the reason for his repeated mistakes. In fact, if he has a good attitude, there will be no unnecessary mistakes at all. The second is tactical and organizational issues. When No.6 and 1 1 were not on the court, the attack was disorganized and many opportunities were not grasped. In the end, the defender was forced to shoot and couldn't score for a long time, so qi zhou's mentality began to change. In addition, our team lacks a real core and a key player. Yi Jianlian worked hard, but he was almost ready. Just look at number 9 in Poland. We don't have such a player. Third, the whole team and coach are still inexperienced when facing the world series. Let me give you a simple example. At the last moment of the fourth inning, the coach used up all the timeouts and left no chance. In fact, we all know that Poland will not give up and will change at the last second. Obviously, our coach is not prescient or inexperienced. This should be in the NBA. When Poland finally failed to attack and the United Arab League grabbed the rebound, there were still four seconds left. At this time, we need to pause and organize a planned attack instead of wasting this opportunity. It was also a deliberate foul for us to lead by three points and let the other side make free throws. These are all manifestations of lack of experience in the competition. However, we are used to it, and so is our football. We all lost the chain at the critical moment. The reason is that our technology is not as good as others. Just look at our women's volleyball team. Therefore, complaints and insults are just fans' venting. There is a saying that competition is a test of usual training.
"In short, everyone's experience is still lacking, and there will be a little tension, which will lead to some judgment deviations in the implementation process. This is hard to say. In short, the other party's experience is richer than ours, and we rarely encounter such a situation. "
This is Li Nan's explanation for the last-minute mistakes of the men's basketball team at the post-match press conference. Simply refine it-lack of experience.
This is indeed an indisputable fact. This China men's basketball team is very young and really lacks competition experience. In the lineup, only the United Arab League and Guo have had the men's basketball World Cup experience.
But is qi zhou's last-minute throw-in error really just because of his inexperience? You know, before serving the sideline ball, you called a timeout and draw tactic, and there were such low-level mistakes that low-level people couldn't make. How can you accept it? What is even more incredible is that this mistake was repeated three times at once.
Don't we have more choices? Of course, for example, you can choose to serve from the backcourt. Even, you can choose the safest way, I just want to serve and hug. After all, we were in the lead at that time, and Poland had to implement foul tactics and get the free throw line from China players. But it's much better than being robbed by a direct mistake, right?
In all fairness, there is still a gap between Gong and his coaching ability in key moments and key games. However, this is understandable. After all, from the head coach's point of view, Li Nan's experience in game coaching is equal to zero. After becoming the head coach of the men's basketball team, Li Nan only led the team to participate in the Asian Games and the preliminaries, and almost never played in Poland.
Three touchlines and two steals are not only instructions from player Li Nan, but also reflections.
Of course, losing to Poland is not the end of the world. Next, the men's basketball team will also play against Venezuela, which is related to qualifying and cannot be lost.