The court's acceptance of the results of judicial expertise depends on many factors, including the legality of the appraisal procedure, the qualification and experience of the appraiser, the reliability and relevance of the appraisal results, and so on. Generally speaking, if the judicial appraisal procedure is legal, the appraiser has relevant qualifications and experience, and the appraisal result is reliable and relevant to the case, then the court will tend to accept the appraisal result.
First, the legitimacy of the appraisal procedure.
When judging whether to accept the results of judicial expertise, the court will first consider the legality of the expertise procedure. If the appraisal procedure violates the procedures prescribed by law, such as not going through a fair lottery procedure and not observing the challenge system, then the court may think that the appraisal procedure is illegal, thus rejecting the appraisal result.
Second, evaluate the qualifications and experience of personnel.
The qualification and experience of the appraiser is also an important factor for the court to judge whether to accept the appraisal results. If the appraiser does not have relevant qualifications and experience, or there is a conflict of interest, then the court may have doubts about the appraisal result.
Three. Reliability and relevance of evaluation results
The court will judge the reliability and relevance of the appraisal results according to the specific circumstances of the case. If there are serious doubts about the appraisal result or it has nothing to do with the case, then the court may not accept the appraisal result.
To sum up:
The court's acceptance of the results of judicial expertise depends on many factors, including the legality of the appraisal procedure, the qualification and experience of the appraiser, the reliability and relevance of the appraisal results, and so on. Generally speaking, if the judicial appraisal procedure is legal, the appraiser has relevant qualifications and experience, and the appraisal result is reliable and relevant to the case, then the court will tend to accept the appraisal result.
Legal basis:
Article 27 of the Supreme People's Court's Provisions on Evidence in Civil Litigation stipulates: "If a party disagrees with the appraisal conclusion made by the appraisal department entrusted by the people's court and applies for re-appraisal, the people's court shall allow: (1) the appraisal institution or appraiser does not have the relevant appraisal qualification; (2) The appraisal procedure is seriously illegal; (3) The evidence of the appraisal conclusion is obviously insufficient; (4) Other circumstances that cannot be used as evidence after cross-examination. "