Yao fen:
1. Draw lots to decide your own number (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
2. First, 1 puts forward the distribution plan, and then five people vote, if and only if more than half.
If you agree, distribute it according to his proposal, or throw it into the sea to feed sharks.
3. If 1 dies, No.2 puts forward a distribution plan, and then four people vote, if and only if it exceeds.
If half of the people agree, they will be distributed according to his proposal, otherwise they will be thrown into the sea to feed sharks.
4. By analogy
Conditions: Every pirate is a very smart person who can rationally judge gains and losses and make choices.
Question: What kind of distribution scheme does the first pirate propose to maximize his income?
My first answer is:
Step 1: If No.4 proposes a plan, whatever No.5 proposes will be rejected. Therefore, there will be no proposal 4.
Conditions.
Step 2: Number 4 definitely supports Number 3. If No.3 puts forward a plan, No.3 and No.4 can get the biggest benefit. Number five.
Will have nothing. Therefore, No.5 will not see the demise of No.2. ..
Step 3: If No.2 puts forward a plan and only No.5 supports it, No.2 will definitely be thrown into the sea. Because number 3 and number 4 are very
If you want to see No.2 perish, you must kill No.2 together, so No.2 will not be stupid enough to watch 1 thrown into the sea.
Step 4: So No.2 must support 1. In order not to be rejected by No.2, No.5 had to support 1. if
No.5 and No.2 support 1, No.3 and No.4 are useless. 1 Just take No.2 and No.5..
. No.3 and No.4 will not support 1 under any circumstances. Switch 1 will be their world. How about 1?
It's no use wooing No.3 and No.4. Between No.2 and No.5, No.2 is more important to 1. No.2 and 1
Five dissolved into an alliance, and five had to support it. Therefore, as long as you can't get any on the 5th, you will always support the number 1.
Conclusion: Therefore, my allocation scheme is that 1, 90, 2, 9, 5, 1, 3, 4 are not available.
I thought I was right, but my colleague said I was wrong. As a result, he gave his analysis. He said my first time.
The fourth step is correct. No.4 and No.5 are natural enemies. It was wrong from the second step. If No.3 puts forward a plan, No.4
This number will get nothing. I don't understand. He said: who is the biggest beneficiary of the death of No.3, it is No.5; Number five.
Looking forward to the death of No.3, No.5 and No.3 are also natural enemies. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, and it is natural to be 30% to 40%.
Dear friends, this is a very loyal friendship. Although No.4 got nothing, he saved himself.
His own life. Life is of course more important than life. So the plan put forward by number three is his own.
100, I can't get any on the 4th and 5th. In my third step, if No.2 puts forward a plan, my relationship with the enemy will be
It has changed. No.3 is the biggest beneficiary after No.2' s death, so No.3 and No.2 are natural enemies. Although in 3
No.4 and No.3 may become faithful friends when they put forward the plan, but because No.4 is worried that if No.3 puts forward the plan,
I can't get any myself. As long as No.2 gives him benefits, I will definitely support No.2, so he will become No.2' s friend.
Although it is a disloyal friend relationship. If No.3 puts forward a plan, No.5 and No.3 will become natural enemies.
Therefore, No.5 and No.2 have become natural friends here, and such friends have high loyalty. So the numbers 4 and 5
As long as No.2 can get one (one is also priceless), they will support No.2, although they may still have it in mind.
Fantasize about getting benefits from number three. So the plan for No.2 may be that No.2 has 98 yuan, No.3 has none, and No.4.
No.5 and No.5 are 1 respectively. If No.4 is not smart enough, he may believe No.3' s good promise and feed No.2 with No.3..
Shark, but the result must be that No.4 found himself cheated and didn't get 1 gem in order to survive. In my first time.
Fourth, if 1 puts forward suggestions, the relationship between the enemy and ourselves will change again. 1 died, and No.2 was the biggest beneficiary.
Who? When No.2 proposed the scheme, No.3 was the natural enemy of No.2, so No.3 was the natural enemy of 1 here.
friends. When No.2 put forward the plan, No.4 was No.2' s friend, but his loyalty was not high, while No.5
1 has a high loyalty to No.2; But here, No.4 knows that he will definitely benefit from No.2,
It is bound to expect more benefits from 1, so No.4 is neither hostile nor disloyal to 1, which is a kind of neutrality.
Relationship; No.5 knows that if No.2 puts forward a plan, its benefit from No.2 is limited, so it is 5 compared with No.2.
Number five and number five. 1 It's easier to talk on an equal footing, No.5 and No. 1 is a friend with low loyalty. 1 Just give it to the 3rd.
1 is enough, because if No.2 is allocated, No.3 will get nothing; Between the 4th and 5th, 1 was wooed.
One is enough; There are too many fantasies on the 4 th, and it is difficult to win them over; No.5 can only get 1 gem from No.2.
As long as 1 gives No.5 two gems, No.5 will take refuge in 1. Therefore, the distribution scheme of 1 is: 97 pieces of 1,
No.2, 1 gem, No.3, 1 gem, No.4, 1 gem, No.5, 2 gem.
From this topic, I realized several philosophies of life. Let's see if it makes sense if I say it here.
First, in order to maximize their own interests, everyone should distinguish between people around them and their own people.
Friend or foe, my relationship. Everyone knows this, but in real life, for the relationship between enemies and friends, people always
I can't tell them apart. Otherwise, everyone should be able to find the answers to the above questions. But I raised this question.
Show it to others, but most people don't know where to start. First of all, people don't know the criteria for dividing the relationship between friends and enemies.
There must be something. Secondly, people don't understand that the relationship between friends and enemies is always changing. For example, for your husband (wife)
We are always used to thinking that we are on my side. When we are hurt by our husbands (wives)
Only when I was injured did I find that things were not that simple. In fact, in most cases, your husband (wife)
Is their own enemy. You should spend the money you earn with him (her), support your family and support your parents together.
Fang's parents, at this time you think he (she) is your friend, but in fact he (she) is your enemy. because
If he or she pays more for you, he or she will pay less. If you don't pay at all, he (she) will bear it.
Take all the responsibility. You are in a completely hostile relationship. Finally, many people don't score enough IQ.
Clarify the relationship between enemies and friends, but don't bother to distinguish such a relationship, or rely on feelings, commitments and other things.
Cover, and failed to distinguish the relationship between friends and enemies. For example, why should we learn from our husbands (wives)?
Once thought it belonged to me? Mainly because there is affection that blinds our eyes.
Second, everything depends on interests. When the interest relationship changes, the former enemies will become friends, friends
Will become enemies. There are eternal interests, but no eternal friends. People who have conflicts of interest with you are your enemies.
People. It is your own people who share the same interests with you and belong to the category of "I" What can support you is.
Your friend. Do we think this clarifies our relationship with the people around us? It's actually wrong. There are two more.
A relationship, a friend of the enemy and a neutral. Friends of the enemy will become your friends under certain conditions, and
Your friends will also become friends of the enemy under certain conditions. Neutrals may also give up their neutral stance.
For you or a friend of your enemy. Who can win more supporters in your confrontation with the enemy?
Who will win? Who will be your supporter depends entirely on whether he gets more benefits from you.
Get more supporters from your enemies.
Third, believe in what you can get, not what you can get, or you may even lose what you have now.
Let's go Before you make a choice every time, you must find out what you are sure to get. For example, for roads
The number 4 in the title. When No.3 didn't give him any advice, he didn't know the situation and believed No.5.
The promise of No.5 (No.5 will definitely tell him that they will throw No.3 into the sea together and share all the gems equally), and finally,
The result must be that after No.3 was thrown into the sea by No.4 and No.5, No.4' s suggestion was rejected by No.5, and No.5 released No.4..
I threw it into the sea and swallowed all the jewels myself. No.4 not only didn't get the gem, but also lost his life.
I lost it. What can number four get? That is, support No.2 when putting forward the plan on No.2, so that you can also start from No.2..
Where to get the jewels.
Fourth, the closer you get to your friend, the less you get from him. I helped a lot of people, but
I didn't get any benefit from them, and now I understand what's going on. It's not that they don't kiss me.
Secret, but they are too close to me. They are very close to me and don't feel the need to use it.
Win my heart.
Fifth, the people around us are not as clever as the five pirates in this topic. So, be smart.
Be smart enough to see through the essence of the problem, but also smart enough to prevent yourself from wishful thinking because of the stupidity of others.
Lost. For example, 1 proposed the allocation scheme of 98,0, 1, 0,2. If the remaining five pirates are very
Silly, they must be unanimously against 1. Because the plan put forward by 1 is that he swallowed almost all the treasures by himself.
Stone. Therefore, as 1, he should first consider the IQ of No.3 and No.5 before proposing a plan. If No.3 and No.5
1 The IQ is as low as 1. After giving them a thorough analysis of the situation, they can't figure out their own situation, and 1 is dead.
That's settled.
Sixth, to see through the essence of the problem, we must give up extravagant hopes, feelings and emotions, and don't believe in promises.
Stick to it and you will get it. We didn't distinguish between friends and enemies because our eyes were too extravagant.
Hopes, feelings, emotions, and commitments are all blinded. In fact, what we can get is only what we are sure to get.
Part.
Seventh, if you give up what you could have got, others will not think you are great, but only think you are not so good.
It's cooked For example, 1, he should be able to get 97 gems; No.2 is his enemy, and there is no gem to give to No.2;
No.3 is his friend, you can give No.3 1 gem; No.4 is neutral. For 1, No.4 is optional.
And No.4 is No.2' s loyal friend, so giving No.4 more may be against 1; Although the fifth is also the second.
Friend, but the relationship between No.5 and No.2 is not very close, so as long as the benefits given to No.5 are better than those given to No.2, you can give it to No.5.
There are many benefits. The 5th meeting will support 1. The number 1 was originally given to 5 two gems to win the number 5, and the number 1 was given.
No.5 has 10 gems. At this time, the 5 th will think that there is no. 1 is immature, which will inevitably put forward more requirements for NO. 1.
So 1 can't control the situation. On the contrary, friends may become enemies.
These five seemingly similar figures put everyone in different interest positions. The people around us are just
Like these five figures, it seems that there is no difference, but in fact it is different from our interests. if
I am 1, and I put forward the distribution plan as I did the first time. If I treat my enemy as my friend, I will become a shark.
Food. We should be smart enough to see through the essence of the problem and smart enough to prevent others from being stupid.
Let our own "wishful thinking" fail. We are not going to be pirates, but we should have the wisdom of pirates.