Why does Japan's deregulation of education not attach importance to exam-oriented education?

It is reported that Japan's economy developed rapidly in the 1960s. As a densely populated eastern country, people generally attach importance to academic qualifications. Almost all families in Japan hope that the extra money can help their children go to college, so the competition for the college entrance examination has become extremely fierce. However, according to Japanese population data, the population aged 18 reached the second postwar baby boom in 192, followed by 22 years until 20 14 years.

According to the report, some experts said that excessive exam-oriented education is problematic. Different countries will try to solve this problem. Some countries' policies may have achieved good results, while others have some problems in their implementation. The liberalization of Japanese education now does not mean to do exam-oriented education, but the original "general education" policy has gone in the wrong direction and failed to achieve the original goal, and now it needs to make new changes.

Most of the education system is immutable, so it is necessary to select students, distinguish students and match students with schools. So I think we should return to the essence of education to consider this issue. Good education should distinguish "materials" through certain scientific methods, and then we can "teach" effectively. If we don't teach students in accordance with their aptitude, the result may be over-education, insufficient education or ineffective education.

Experts say it is necessary to distinguish students through exams, but we can make it more scientific in different ways. A good examination system must consider these three aspects: first, the scientific nature of the examination, whether the system can really distinguish people, second, multi-differentiation, everyone has different "materials", and third, the examination system also has problems of fairness and cost.