1. The epidemic situation in Britain is far more optimistic than that in Turkey;
2. Players don't need to be isolated for a long time in England;
3. Fans can go to England to watch football normally.
The importance of the Champions League final is self-evident, and no accidents are allowed in the highly anticipated events. Going to Turkey is too risky for the players of both teams. Once COVID-19 is infected, all subsequent events will be directly affected. In this way, UEFA, as the organizer, will bear the anger of all fans and insiders and intensify a series of contradictions accumulated in the past. From a global perspective, the venue change of the Champions League can solve most problems.
First, ensure the safety of players. Players are the most basic guarantee of game ratings. Only when they play football healthily will fans be willing to buy tickets for the game. No matter how excellent the protective measures are, as long as the players go to Turkey, they will inevitably come into contact with people outside the team. At that time, once a series of communication events occur, the Champions League final will not start as scheduled. This kind of loss is absolutely unbearable for UEFA, and they can't take the risk.
Second, avoid schedule conflicts. The upcoming European Cup will be the primary goal of all participating national teams, and the players are ready for it. Due to the short interval between the Champions League and it, once players need to be isolated, they will miss the first game of the European Cup. To this end, we must find a relatively more convenient place, such as London.
Third, it is convenient for fans to watch the Champions League final. Fans' enthusiasm for the Champions League final can be reflected through various social media, and their tickets are also an important source of Champions League income. UEFA didn't want to give up such a big piece of cake because of the epidemic, so it made a temporary adjustment.
How much impact do you think this change of venue will have on the team?