1, sort out all the essential loopholes of the opponent in the whole game, and refute and guide them.
2. Summarize our views and elaborate deeply.
3. And most importantly, sublimation to the value level means that our views are of great significance to the overall direction.
Prepare four arguments. In the school debate, the time of four debates is 4 minutes? Generally speaking, the distribution is as follows:?
1, correct each other+sum up our own side, about 1 minutes and a half to 2 minutes?
2. Sublimate the theme for at least two minutes.
Extended data
Debate skills
1, play with force
There is a trick in martial arts novels called "fighting with martial arts". It means that people with deep internal forces can use each other's attack power to fight back. This method is also suitable for argument.
2. Transplantation method
Removing the defective part of the opponent's argument and replacing it with our favorable point of view or material can often achieve the miraculous effect of "one thousand four hundred taels", which is called "grafting"
Step 3 go with the flow
On the surface, agree with the other party's point of view, follow the other party's logic, and set some reasonable obstacles in the derivation according to your own needs, so that the other party's point of view cannot be established under additional conditions, or draw completely opposite conclusions.
4. Former Qingyuan
The so-called radical, for example, this paper points out that the other party's argument is not closely related to the topic or runs counter to it, and fundamentally corrects the position of the other party's argument and pulls it into our "sphere of influence" to make it just serve our point of view. Compared with the "pushing the boat with the current" method of forward reasoning, this technique is just the opposite of its thinking.
5. Holding the salary at the bottom of the pot
Clever and selective questioning is one of the offensive moves used by many debaters. Usually, this kind of question is premeditated, which will put people in a "dilemma". No matter which choice the other party makes, it will be unfavorable to them. A concrete way to deal with this kind of questioning is to take out a preset option from the other party's selective questioning and carry out a powerful backchat to fundamentally defeat the other party's spirit. This technique is to take a radical step.
6. attack its key point
In a debate, it often happens that the two sides are entangled in some trivial issues, examples or expressions. As a result, the debate seems lively, but in fact it deviates from Wan Li's topic. This is a taboo in argument. An important skill is to quickly find out the key problem in the other party's argument after the other party's argument, seize this problem and attack it to the end, so as to completely defeat the other party in theory.
7. Take advantage of contradictions
Because the two sides of the debate are composed of four players, four players often have contradictions in the process of debate. Even the same player may have conflicts in the free debate because he speaks too fast. Once this happens, we should seize it immediately and try our best to expand the contradiction between the other side so that it can't take care of itself and attack us.
8. Pull a snake out of the hole
In the debate, there is often a deadlock: when the other side insists on its own argument, no matter how we attack it, the other side only responds with a few words. If we still adopt the method of frontal attack, it will have little effect.
In this case, it is necessary to adjust the means of attack as soon as possible, adopt a circuitous method, start with seemingly insignificant issues, and induce the other party to leave the position, thus hitting the other party and causing a sensational effect in the hearts of the judges and the audience.
9. Li is stiff
When we encounter some arguments that are difficult to demonstrate logically or theoretically, we have to adopt the method of "Li Jiang" and introduce new concepts to solve the difficulties.
10, delaying tactical plan
First, take a slow standby preemptive strike? As the saying goes, "haste makes waste." Acting rashly when the time is not ripe often fails to achieve the goal. The same is true of argumentation, and "slowness" is also necessary under certain conditions.
In fact, the method of "winning slowly" is a delaying tactic in the debate and a strategy to delay the invasion of the other side. When the debate situation is not suitable for quick decision or the time is not yet ripe, direct confrontation between the needle and the wheat should be avoided and the time should be delayed to wait for the arrival of the fighter plane. Once the time is right, we can attack the enemy from behind and defeat him.
Second, the implementation is slow, weak and strong? The method of "winning by slowness" is suitable for the debate occasions where disadvantages are against advantages and disadvantages are against strengths. It is a strategic means adopted by the weak to defeat the seemingly powerful side. There is a trick to "slow", and slow motion should be clever.
The word "slow" here is not synonymous with slow response and inarticulate, but one of the magic weapons used by eloquent speakers who are still wise and stupid.
Thirdly, it is a good skill to slow down anger, to cool down anger in debate and to heat up slowly. In an argument, people who are angry and have poor self-control are easily excited. In this case, to convince people who are overly excited, it is advisable to deal with them in slow motion and slow tone. Slowing down anger, from cold to hot, can make it "cool down and decompress".
Only when the other person is calm can you accept your truth smoothly. In short, "fast" and "slow" in the debate are also a dialectical relationship of unity of opposites. Soldiers are expensive and fast, and "fast" is of course good. However, sometimes "slowness" has its beauty. Slow can stand by, slow can make plans, and slow can control anger.
Slow is a tough tactic, slow is a protracted war, and slow is a delaying tactic in the war of words. Although it takes a long time to walk slowly and spend slowly, it is often a shortcut to victory, although there is a big bend.
Baidu encyclopedia-debate contest