All the answers are presented:
Socrates case
In 399 BC, Athens drew lots and randomly selected 50 1 person from the candidates who volunteered to register to form a jury to try Socrates. Socrates defended himself within the prescribed time. After two rounds of voting, the jury sentenced him to death by a majority. More than 65,438+0,000 years later, a resident scholar wrote: "This is a black stain on Athens and the freedom it symbolizes. How did Socrates' trial happen in such a free society? How can Athens be unfaithful to itself? "
Question:
(1) When did the Socrates case take place in Athens?
(2) Who in the following shortlist is eligible for the jury?
(3) How do you evaluate the democratic system in Athens through Socrates' case?
answer
(1) Answer 1: Classical times (or close to it)
classical age
Athens in its heyday
Other answers: 399 BC or early 4th century BC.
(2) Answer L: ③ or fcooco, a 40-year-old male citizen of Athens. Composition guidance net.cn^
Other answers: multiple-choice questions or wrong questions
(3) Answer L: Extract the essential characteristics of Athenian democracy from the materials.
Socrates was finally sentenced to death, which shows that democratic politics may produce tyranny of the majority.
The trial process of Socrates case shows that procedural justice does not necessarily mean fair results.
Answer 2: It does not combine materials, but it can point out the essential characteristics of Athenian democracy.
Democracy in Athens can easily lead to the abuse of power.
Answer 3: We can make rational use of materials and judge from two aspects.
On the bright side, there are lots, voluntary registration, debate and two rounds of voting; The disadvantage is that only adult male citizens in Athens can participate.
Democracy in Athens is positive and reasonable, because its procedures are strictly regulated; There are also disadvantages, because not everyone has the right to participate.
Answer 4: There are reasons or facts above 1 that can be judged unilaterally.
Answer 5: only make simple judgments.