1. Environmental protection is a very scientific human project. Without the guidance of scientific theory, any environmental protection action can not achieve good results, and even have negative effects.
2. Environmental protection is an urgent and serious problem in front of human beings, and it is a big test related to the life and death of future generations. On this issue, human beings can't tolerate any carelessness and slowness. In order to improve the efficiency and speed of environmental protection, we must have scientific methods, and we must fully and maximally apply scientific methods to effectively ensure the effectiveness and durability of environmental protection. Facts and practice have proved that science and technology are the primary productive forces and absolute productive forces. Before you say this sentence again, you need to "tie" environmental protection and productivity together.
3. History has proved that human self-control is unreliable in the face of huge interests, and it is impossible to prevent the occurrence of environmental damage only by moral constraints, but scientific methods can make up for this fatal defect. We know that the deterioration of the environment ultimately stems from the over-exploitation and over-discharge of human beings. In an earlier era, due to the limitation of science and technology, human beings could not find scientific methods conducive to production and environmental protection, so they could not effectively protect the environment. But now all this may be overcome by human beings in a foreseeable short time. It is precisely with highly developed science and technology and highly popularized scientific methods that we can use effective scientific methods to achieve zero industrial emissions and efficient utilization of resources or even recycling. When our development and natural emissions are reduced to zero by modern science and technology, we naturally stop destroying the environment and protect it.
If you choose moral constraints, I suggest you look for the following breakthroughs:
1. History has proved that only the people are the only driving force to promote social development, and only human beings can use their own scientific methods to develop and create. As we all know, science is a sharp "double-edged sword". Only strict moral constraints can control it to move in a direction conducive to human development, including environmental protection, of course. Otherwise, no matter how advanced scientific methods and theoretical technologies are, they may become accomplices of war maniacs and terrorist forces.
2. History has also proved that the grim situation of our environment today is mainly due to people's lack of environmental awareness in the past, that is, there is no moral constraint to protect the environment, but a large part of environmental damage events around the world today are caused by people on purpose. Are these people because they have no environmental awareness? (Just like people in the industrial age) Of course not. Human beings have been emphasizing environmental protection for decades, and the reason why they want to destroy the environment is because there is no moral constraint except huge economic interests and appeasement laws and regulations. If human moral constraints can develop as fast as science and technology, the concept of environmental protection was put forward as early as the industrial revolution. If human beings can always abide by moral constraints, today's environment will be different. Generally speaking, the deterioration of the environment is ultimately caused by the lack of moral constraints, and moral constraints must be used to "treat the symptoms."
3. Science, technology, methods and theories can only be developed and utilized by human beings. If our scientific community is not guided by moral constraints, a considerable number of them will be guided by forces keen to continue to destroy the environment and make a fortune. At that time, all their theories and methods will only play a role in destroying the environment and lead to further deterioration of the environment. What about environmental protection? Therefore, scientific methods must have moral constraints to be used reasonably.
~ ~ I'm exhausted. I have to discuss the concept that should not be separated. Whose problem is this? That's evil.