At present, residents respond to the government's request to carry out national normalized nucleic acid testing, which is a civic obligation and must be unconditionally obeyed and cooperated. However, if this normalized nucleic acid detection needs to be charged, it involves the fairness of trading and buying and selling. Now that it is a deal, citizens have the right to refuse. Because the existing laws do not support forcing citizens to buy services. Therefore, it is necessary to define the nature of normalized nucleic acid detection. Because standardized testing is mandatory, but the fee is commercial, so this is really a problem. If this problem is not clear, it is suggested to temporarily stop the national normalized nucleic acid detection fee. Of course, residents' voluntary testing meets the requirements of personal work and travel, and there is no dispute about the charge for nucleic acid testing. This reward is reasonable.
This is a problem, and it is not a simple one. If the test has been free, the local finance can't afford it, but the test is required to be charged, and the problem comes. The nucleic acid test for all employees is not required by residents, so this problem seems to be a problem of money, but it is not just a problem of money. Is nuclear testing a civic obligation or a paid service provided by the government? If it is voluntary service, there must be legal provisions. If paid services are provided, citizens can choose to refuse according to their actual situation. The biggest problem is that if people are deliberately prevented from testing because of the cost of testing, it will obviously bring loopholes and hidden dangers to local epidemic prevention, so be cautious.