Can the interests of the minority be sacrificed for the interests of the majority? (Specific answer) More than 200 words

This is actually an idealized problem. From a humanistic point of view, 200 people and 300 people are actually equally important. This is not a simple addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.

From the perspective of survival, assuming there are no other humans in the world, I may choose a ship that can breed human races, depending on the ratio of men and women on board, age and physical analysis. ...

In extreme cases, the phrase "sacrificing the interests of the minority for the benefit of the majority" can be understood, such as drawing lots to eat people on an island without food. -?

This assumption often appears in science fiction and is also mentioned in Liu's speeches and blog posts.

But in reality, this sentence has been abused. A few people think that their opinions and decisions represent the interests of the vast majority, so this sentence has become a panacea.