"The re-inspection result of drunk driving in fatal accident is zero", how do relevant departments respond?

With the continuous improvement of people's living standards, people's travel modes are becoming more and more convenient. From ancient horse-drawn carriages to modern private cars, bicycles, trains and planes. The technology content is getting higher and higher, and the speed is getting faster and faster. In particular, the emergence of private cars has brought great convenience to people's travel. Almost everyone can drive a private car as long as they get a driver's license. Although private cars bring great convenience to people, people who don't obey the traffic rules will bring security risks to people. Many people hate drunk driving very much, because drunk driving is very easy to cause car accidents and bring people loss of life and property, so the punishment for drunk driving in China is also very heavy.

When we suspect that someone is driving after drinking, we often determine the alcohol concentration in the blood through blood tests. Once it exceeds the standard, we will accept legal sanctions. I thought there would be no problem in the police investigation, but I didn't expect there were still mistakes. On May 7th, 20021year, Anqing Municipal Bureau of Justice issued the Circular on Wrong Appraisal Opinions of Anhui Xinli Judicial Appraisal Institute, saying? Anhui Xinli Judicial Appraisal Institute and judicial appraisers Shen Jianping and Xu Haitao transferred it to Anqing Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Detachment High-speed Fourth Brigade? Y7842 1 175？ In the blood alcohol content test of 1 blood sample, the identification operation was seriously wrong, and wrong identification opinions were issued, which brought passivity to the case investigation work of the case-handling unit, caused dissatisfaction of the perpetrators and the families of the deceased, and caused bad influence. ?

Anqing Municipal Bureau of Justice said that in this incident, the first appraiser made a serious mistake in the appraisal operation, the second appraiser's review became a mere formality, the internal management system was not effectively implemented, and the judicial appraisers involved in the case had a weak sense of quality and responsibility. At present, the first appraiser has been criticized and educated, deducted the performance bonus of the month and transferred from his post for three months. As the public security department of the country, I hope all the staff can treat their work meticulously and avoid such a thing from happening again.