Irregular bidding for construction projects is a long-standing problem in China's construction industry. In this regard, local construction management departments have taken a number of effective measures to rectify and standardize the bidding work of construction projects in accordance with the Bidding Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), so that the bidding work of construction projects will enter an orderly operation stage.
However, there are still some problems that cannot be ignored in the specific operation.
First, make use of each other and "accompany each other". That is, the tendering units collude with each other to draw up the winning bidder, and other units fully cooperate to perform;
Second, play a temporary employment card to form a "bidding". That is to say, in order to crowd out competitors, a construction enterprise participates in the bidding of the same construction project in the name of several construction enterprises at the same time, and carries out "bidding" operation;
Third, cliques, malicious "collusion", that is, bidders collude with each other in advance, so that all bidders' bidding quotations "run at a high level";
The fourth is the black market intermediary, "selling baskets." In other words, some lawless elements use interests as "bait" to persuade those bidding construction enterprises that lack confidence to join the team of "accompanying bidding", "surrounding bidding" and "colluding bidding" to profit from it;
Five, bid evaluation in a hurry, should not be preferred. At present, the bid evaluation methods in various places are roughly as follows: bid evaluation on the same day, selection of judges on the same day, and bid evaluation on the same day. In such a hurry, there are many natural ills;
Six, the contract is changeable, leaving hidden dangers. Once the construction enterprise was determined, it should have signed the construction contract in strict accordance with the bidding documents, but some changed the cost and some changed the material requirements, leaving hidden dangers;
Seven, system defects, method disadvantages. These problems violate the principles of "openness, justice and fairness" in bidding for construction projects and affect the healthy development of China's construction market, so effective measures need to be taken to regulate them.
The first is to innovate the management mechanism of construction projects, and change the projects managed by several government departments into a department set up by the government to centralize and unify construction management. For example, in 2002, Shenzhen took the lead in setting up a construction bureau with full financial allocation, which was responsible for the unified construction management of government investment projects.
Second, improve the current bidding laws and regulations. At present, there are generally three methods: reasonable pricing, bid evaluation and extraction, the lowest evaluated bid price and comprehensive evaluation, all of which have problems. In the exploration of public selection of construction teams for government investment projects with an investment of less than 6,543,800 yuan and more than 300,000 yuan, the "public bidding and extraction method" is tried out, that is, the project cost consulting agency is entrusted to prepare the project budget in advance for each construction project, which is announced to the public through the trading center or fixed media after being audited by the audit department, so that qualified construction units can participate in the public lottery.
Third, improve the corresponding departmental regulations, establish and improve the project bid bond system, establish the market access system, establish the project guarantee and project insurance system, improve the market inspection system, and accelerate the establishment of a credit system that regulates construction enterprises and professionals.
Fourth, to strengthen the supervision and management of the government, mainly from these aspects:
1. Reduce the phenomenon that the construction party uses pre-qualification restrictions, excludes potential bidders or engages in fake bidding.
2. Further improve the bid evaluation method. If the comprehensive evaluation method is adopted for bid evaluation, it is necessary to scientifically and reasonably set the scoring content and the score of the index system to reduce the arbitrary influence of human factors.
3. Strengthen the management of pre-tender estimate. If the tenderer has a pre-tender estimate, the pre-tender estimate is only for reference and should not be used as the direct basis for winning the bid, so as to prevent the pre-tender estimate from manipulating the bid.
4. Strengthen the management of bid evaluation experts. Improve the confidentiality system of bid evaluation experts, improve the professional allocation of bid evaluation experts, increase the number of experts, strengthen the behavior supervision of experts in the bid evaluation process, and establish a liquidation mechanism for disqualification in violation of discipline.
5. Strengthen the supervision of bidding agencies and engineering construction supervision institutions. The establishment of agency (intermediary) institutions work quality assessment methods, strengthen dynamic management, establish illegal files, and severely investigate and deal with illegal acts of agency (intermediary) institutions.
6. Accelerate the informatization construction of administrative supervision. Supervise the sharing of "information resources" and enhance the binding force and authority of supervision and management. It laid a foundation for the smooth bid opening and evaluation, and for reporting and investigating illegal cases.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd