Can the court draw lots for disability appraisal be overturned?

Under normal circumstances, if you apply to the court for appraisal, the court will not allow any application for re-appraisal. If you are not satisfied with the disability appraisal entrusted by the court, you can apply for a new judicial approval, or overturn the disability grade recognized by the appraisal entrusted by the court through court trial. If there is not enough evidence to overturn the appraisal conclusion or the appraisal institution does not have the qualification of judicial appraisal, it cannot re-apply for judicial appraisal. Instead of entrusting disability appraisal, the parties directly sued and asked the people's court to entrust disability appraisal.

First, in any of the following circumstances, the judicial authentication institution may accept the entrustment for re-authentication:

1. The judicial authentication institution or judicial appraiser conducts authentication beyond the business scope or practice category of judicial authentication;

2. The submitted certification materials are false or inaccurate;

3. The standards, methods or equipment used in the original appraisal are improper, which leads to the unscientific and inaccurate conclusion of the original appraisal;

4, the original appraisal conclusion is contradictory with other evidence;

5, the original judicial appraiser should avoid and did not avoid;

6, the original judicial appraiser issued a wrong conclusion due to fault.

Two, the assessment procedures for personal injury in traffic accidents are generally as follows:

1, the appraisee shall carry the application for disability assessment with the official seal of the case-handling unit and the signature of the case-handling person;

2. Carry the diagnosis certificate, examination results, ct, X-ray and diagnosis report of hospitals at or above the county level;

3. Borrow relevant surgical medical records and inspection records from the treatment hospital;

4. When appraising the dependent's working ability, the appraiser's ID card, household registration certificate and explanations from relevant government departments should also be brought;

5. The evaluation should be based on the injury directly caused by the accident or the end of treatment of confirmed complications. If the treatment is not over yet, and the basis for compensation needs to be provided due to mediation, it shall be stated in the application;

6. The appraiser needs to accept the inspection in person and pay the specified appraisal fee.

Third, the assessment of disability level needs to be based on the following three situations:

1, therapeutic effect after human injury.

2. The relationship between disability and accidents and injuries.

3. Primary injuries directly caused by traffic accidents and complications or sequelae caused by injuries.

Legal basis:

Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Procedure

Article 27

If a party disagrees with the appraisal conclusion made by the appraisal department entrusted by the people's court and applies for re-appraisal and provides evidence to prove that one of the following circumstances exists, the people's court shall allow it:

(a) the appraisal institution or appraiser does not have the relevant appraisal qualifications;

(2) The appraisal procedure is seriously illegal;

(3) The evidence of the appraisal conclusion is obviously insufficient;

(4) Other circumstances that cannot be used as evidence after cross-examination. If the conclusion of defect appraisal can be solved by supplementary appraisal, re-appraisal or supplementary cross-examination, it will not be re-appraised. "