As for what I find magical, the following excerpts are as follows:
Argument: It is wiser to pursue innocence/satisfaction.
Founder: If the Buddha obeyed the wishes of people at that time, how did the Buddha achieve detachment and change all beings?
Professor: It's not that failure is unwise. Sometimes failure is wise for you and wise for others.
Opposing party: Pursuing the satisfactory consideration of multiple interests can make individuals and society achieve a win-win situation.
Counterparty: Satisfaction is not about not expressing your own opinions, but listening to others' opinions.
Counterparty: Each of us has the right to bargain with life. We can all negotiate and compromise.
Debate: Should public figures be/should not be what they seem?
Professor: What we need is not a fake puppet, but a sincere smile.
Professor: What is the person who tells the whole story? Is he a child? How can it be inconsistent without showing it?
Counterparty: If there is a higher value than honesty, can honesty be compromised for this value?
The opposing side: Kai Ko is what he appears to be, and he himself advocates drug abuse. Is this what you want to see?
Counterparty: Is it true that a person has never said a white lie? Is this what you advocate?
Debate: It is wiser to pursue innocence/satisfaction.
Pro: It's sad if it's just to show other people's joys and sorrows.
Pro: The other party has been saying that people's hearts are harmonious, which is naturally good, but when there is conflict, we choose the heart.
Pro: Do you agree or disagree with wisdom when others force you to get married?
Opposing party: If you are bent on your own way and just want to be innocent, what's the point of those unsupportive voices on the road at last?
Against: Pursuing innocence is more touching, but pursuing satisfaction is more practical and stable.
Debate: It is the gospel/death knell of human civilization that artificial intelligence replaces human labor.
There is another thing in human nature called yearning for freedom and happiness, so it means that it is impossible for people to give their decision-making power to anything inhuman.
Pro: The most valuable thing in life is experience, not output value.
Debate: Do we need a time machine?
Pro: When we discuss our hometown, we always say right or wrong, because what we miss is not a certain place, but a certain period of time.
Counterparty: An ordinary person who is willing to pay such an expensive price to see his past must be trapped in memories.
Debate: Should humans respond to the exploration signals of alien civilizations?
It takes only a hundred years for bones to turn into dust, but in the chronology of the universe, it is only a moment, just like a gully disappearing on the beach, and human beings never seem to exist.