Can judicial expertise institutions of medical disputes choose patients? Or was it appointed by the judge?

1. At the hearing, the plaintiff and the defendant will be required to designate judicial authentication institutions respectively. If they overlap, they will be the one that overlaps; if they don't, they will be randomly selected. I sued the hospital for medical malpractice, which was randomly generated by lottery. Forensic experts are now in cahoots with the hospital. My appraisal conclusion is that the other party is at fault, but I have recovered. Funny, right? You should be mentally prepared, and you can get an objective conclusion without reason and evidence.

Because I am from Beijing, I don't know how to deal with foreigners. It is understood that the appraiser should pay the fee you mentioned. If the judicial authentication institutions require different authentication fees according to different authentication situations, those who claim to compensate first will be borne by the original defendant or the defendant respectively according to the proportion of fault, and some courts also require the fault party to bear all of them.

3. The appraisal fee is an invoice without details. The appraisal has no consequences, and no matter what the result is, you need to pay the same appraisal fee.

4. mine is the identification of limb function damage. You need to consult an ophthalmologist again.