1, relying on the tangible market of bidding, increase investment and speed up network construction. The practice of "no meeting", that is, the tenderer and the bidder do not meet, reduces the opportunities of "bidding" and "collusion"; Bidders don't meet each other, don't know who their competitors are, and bid back to back, so that each bidder can only make a firm offer, which fully realizes the principle of fair competition and the original intention of bidding.
2. Reduce the entry threshold and increase the bidding cost. All the projects that enter the bidding of the municipal construction engineering trading center are based on the qualification level determined by the relevant provisions of the Ministry of Construction, and shall not be improved, nor shall the enterprise performance and awards be regarded as additional access conditions, and it is clear that foreign construction enterprises can participate in bidding as long as they pass the record. In fact, the "post-qualification review" regulation currently implemented in Chongqing has played a role in curbing collusive bidding and collusive bidding to a certain extent.
3. Scientifically and reasonably optimize the bid evaluation methods to reduce the chances of winning the bid by those who bid around or collude in bidding. At present, Chongqing has general rules on bid evaluation methods, but it is this general rule that has contributed to collusive bidding and collusive bidding. For example, the bid evaluation method of lump sum contract tender with civil engineering quota valuation is in the range of +3% ~-5%, and the quotation beyond this range is zero, because this range is too small, which leads to bidders who are not "bidding group" being "thrown out" and the "bidding group" benefiting from it. For another example, the total price score in the bid evaluation method of unit price contract bidding with list valuation is too low, and the score of "main materials, main list and other items" is actually set for the bidding skills of the "bidding group", so many bidders will give up bidding after careful analysis.
4. Take honesty as the judgment, and actively promote the construction of credit system. Establishing a credit system in the construction field is a fundamental policy to rectify and standardize the market order and an important measure to ensure the reform and development of the construction industry. At present, it is necessary to make further use of the existing credit information system, solve the problem of compatibility and sharing of enterprise credit information data between regions on the basis of the existing credit file system, and gradually realize regional and national networking; In view of the outstanding problems existing in the current construction market, such as irregular bidding process, arrears in project payment, black and white contract, etc., credit standards are formulated to clarify which behaviors are untrustworthy; Establish a disciplinary mechanism for dishonesty, fully mobilize and give full play to the role of all parties in the construction of credit system, evaluate the market behavior of enterprises, record all kinds of dishonesty and illegal behaviors of bidding parties in the bidding and contract performance stages, and open them to the public, accept inquiries, link their credit status with their bidding work, guide enterprises with good credit to win more bids, and punish enterprises with bad faith.
5. Cancel centralized reconnaissance and answer questions. The tenderee shall describe the construction site in detail as much as possible when compiling the tender documents, and the potential bidders shall arrange their own reconnaissance as needed. For special projects that really need centralized reconnaissance, the tenderer will invite the competent departments of discipline inspection and bidding to send personnel to participate. If potential bidders have any questions, they will submit them anonymously by e-mail, the tenderee will publish the Q&A documents online, and the potential bidders will obtain the Q&A documents online.
6, the implementation of remote extraction of judges or remote bid evaluation. For general projects, the tenderee randomly selects judges from the expert database of the tendering and bidding trading center through the computer voice notification system. For key projects, it is suggested to select judges from different places and implement a bid evaluation system from different places. The location of the judges or bid evaluation in different places shall be determined by drawing lots in a confidential state, and the area where all bidders of the project are located is generally not included in the extraction scope. The entourage keeps a dedicated telephone to communicate with the outside world, and the rest of the communication tools are stored in a centralized way after being closed.
Joining countermeasures
1, strict bidder qualification examination. The tenderer must review the qualification information provided by the bidders one by one according to the specific requirements specified in the tender documents. The business license, qualification certificate, safety production license, bid bond issuing unit, bid document seal, project manager certificate and project manager safety certificate of the bidder must be completely consistent. Check the identity of bidders and members of the project department, focusing on the labor contract and social endowment insurance manual for more than one year. If the name of the labor contract, employer or pension insurance payer is inconsistent with that of the bidder, the qualification examination will not be passed. At the same time, it is suggested that the proposed project manager must go to the bid opening site with the authorized representative of the project bidding, and must inform the proposed project manager to participate in the tenderer's defense before sending the bid-winning notice to the winning bidder.
2. Strict bid bond settlement management. The bid bond and the project price must be settled by the bidder basic account in a non-cash way. After winning the bid, the bid bond submitted by the bidder will be converted into a commitment bond that does not lend qualification. The commitment bond can only be refunded after the bidder's inspectors enter the site. The identity verification of the tenderee's construction management personnel entering the site is a substantial barrier to the qualification, and the tenderee shall establish an on-site inspection system and a daily attendance system for the personnel of the winning bidder's project department. If it is found that the personnel entering the site are inconsistent with the personnel of the winning project department and are suspected of borrowing qualifications, once verified, the qualification for winning the bid will be cancelled, and the commitment deposit will not be returned and transferred to the tenderer's account.
3. It is suggested to implement the system of on-site inspection by the tenderee during the bid-winning publicity. For large-scale projects, the tenderee can conduct on-the-spot investigation on the successful candidates during the bid-winning publicity period, mainly to investigate whether they have the ability to perform the contract, whether the performance certification materials provided during bidding are true, and whether the project team members have projects under construction.
4. It is suggested to include the content suspected of borrowing qualification in the terms of pre-qualification documents or bidding documents. In addition to the provisions of national laws and regulations, the situation of relying on qualifications can be identified from the following aspects: first, paying bid bond or performance bond with personal funds; Second, in addition to leaving management fees, enterprises transfer most project funds to individuals; Third, the construction site management personnel are not in conformity with those promised in the tender or are not in place according to the actual progress of the project.