In order to ensure a high starting point, high quality and high level of work, it is usually necessary to prepare a plan in advance, and the content and form of the plan should be carried out around the theme, and finally achieve the expected effect and significance. So how do we write the plan? The following is my collection of primary school debate planning schemes (selected 3), for reference only. Let's have a look.
Planning scheme of primary school students' debate competition 1 1. Purpose of the activity
In order to improve students' language expression ability and improvisation ability, and provide a stage for students to display their talents, our No.4 primary school in Shahe City decided to hold the debate competition for grades four, five and six in 65438+February. Combined with the moral education in our school, let children present various problems to students in the process of constant conversation, discussion and debate through the form of student debate, so that students can face up to their own problems.
Second, the competition method
The debating contest was held in the form of a class contest, in which three main debaters and 12 deputy debaters participated, and four classes in grade four drew lots to decide the opposing sides of the debate. The debate is divided into four parts: opening statement, aggressive statement, free debate and concluding statement.
1. Grouping stage (divided into 6 groups)
There are 6 groups in the whole school, and the squad leaders of each class draw lots to fight. Students participating in the competition are selected by the monitor according to their usual performance. Students participating in the competition must first register with the class monitor, who will contact the person in charge of the debate. All the team members will be trained by the monitor and class teacher.
2. Last stage
In the competition, the time and debate position of each team are determined by drawing lots. The competition is conducted by combining points and comments. Members of the participating grades guarantee to participate in the debate activities on time. The debate is scheduled for 20 minutes before class from Tuesday to Friday morning and afternoon.
Awards: 8 best debaters were selected in each grade, and the best organization award was 1 name.
Notify the relevant matters of the competition on time, and require all classes of Grade 4, Grade 5 and Grade 6 15 students to be present on time on the day of the final. The venue will be located in the multimedia room on the third floor.
Person in charge: Zhou Xiaoying
Judge: Deng Lufan and Hou Lixia.
Three. Debate on topics, rules and regulations
1. The theme of this debate is: Should I get paid for working at home?
Pro: Working from home should not be paid.
Counterparty: Working from home should be paid.
2. Procedure:
The first link, pro-debater's opening statement (1 minute); The second part, the pros and cons attack each other (4 minutes); The third link, the pros and cons are free to debate (7 minutes); In the fourth game, the opposing debater made a concluding speech (1 minute); Finally, director Deng comments (2 minutes).
3. Evaluation criteria
(1) Cumulative calculation of time spent by each team. When one party has finished speaking, the time spent by the other party is calculated.
(2) In terms of total time, there is no limit to the order, times and time of speaking.
(3) If one team runs out of time, the other team can give up speaking or take turns to speak until the time runs out. Giving up the speech does not affect the score.
(4) During the competition, the debater shall not leave his seat or disturb the opponent or his debater.
4. Scoring criteria
(1) The comprehensive impression is divided into language etiquette (5 points) and group cooperation (5 points), with a total score of 10, and the highest level is the winner of the best organization award in this level;
(2) Personal scores include overall cooperation 10, language expression 10, refutation 10, aesthetic elegance 10, and comprehensive impression 10, totaling 50 points; The highest score is the best debater in the game;
Four. Activities require
1. Strengthen activity awareness. It is necessary to take this student debate competition as an opportunity to establish a regular activity mechanism to meet the needs of students, so that the debate activities will gradually become standardized; In addition, we should make the debate contest a brand project of moral education in our school, closely focus on the central work of the school, closely follow the theme of students' moral development, and be close to the reality of students' lives, and strive to create cultural masterpieces of moral education and Young Pioneers' activities in our school.
2. Do a good job in implementation. Each class should do a good job in organizing the debate and organize trials around the theme of the debate.
3. Team members should wear dresses and red scarves.
In a word, carrying out such activities has built a good platform for improving students' comprehensive quality, which is of great help to improve students' ability to cope with emergencies, collect and organize information and express themselves orally. On this basis, the debate activities in our school will be better and better.
Planning scheme of primary school students' debate contest 2 I. Purpose of the activity
In view of all kinds of social problems that plague educators and parents in our school, let the majority of minors present their problems to students in the form of student debate in the process of continuous conversation, discussion and debate, so that students can face up to their own problems.
Second, the competition method
This debating competition is organized by two teams in a class of Grade Four, Grade Five and Grade Six, and each team consists of four debaters and a team leader. The debate is divided into two stages. The first stage is the group elimination (20xx completed on April 29th). The second stage is the final stage (completed on May 6th, 20xx).
1, group knockout stage (divided into 3 groups)
The whole school ***6 groups, draw lots to fight, and select the best 4 groups for the final. 1 best debater is awarded in each competition.
2. Last stage
(1) Awards: first prize 1, second prize 1, third prize 1.
(2) The competition will be held at 2: 00pm on May 6th in 20xx School.
(3) At that time, the relevant matters of the contest will be notified, and the finalists in the third, fourth and fifth years will be required to send four representatives and a teacher to lead the team, and each class will send 15 students and all the class teachers in all grades to participate in the observation. The competition venue is located in the activity room.
(4) In the competition, the number of times and debate positions of each team are determined by drawing lots. The competition is conducted by combining points and comments.
Three. Debate on topics, rules and regulations
1. The preliminary topic of this debate is:
1. Positive: The advantages of watching TV during primary school outweigh the disadvantages. Negative: Watching TV during primary school does more harm than good.
2. In favor: The advantages of parents giving pocket money to primary school students outweigh the disadvantages. Objection: Parents giving pocket money to primary school students do more harm than good.
2. See Annexes I and II for specific competition procedures and rules.
Four. Activities require
1, strengthen activity awareness.
First of all, we must establish a sense of project work. It is necessary to take this student debate competition as an opportunity to establish a regular activity mechanism that meets the needs of students and make the debate competition activities gradually standardized.
The second is to establish a sense of service, that is, to make activities an effective carrier to serve the growth and development of minors, and to become a concrete measure to activate students' campus life and enhance the vitality of moral education in our school.
Third, we should establish brand awareness. It is necessary to make the debate contest a brand project of moral education in our school, closely focus on the central work of the school, closely follow the theme of students' moral development, and be close to the reality of students' lives, and strive to create cultural masterpieces of moral education and Young Pioneers' activities in our school.
2. Do a good job in implementation. Each class should do a good job in organizing the debate and organize trials around the theme of the debate.
3. Team members should wear dresses and red scarves.
Planning scheme of primary school students' debate competition 3 I. Activity background:
Purpose: The main purpose of this debate competition is to enrich students' after-school life, enliven the campus atmosphere, promote friendly relations between classes, open up students' ideas, improve students' debating level and cultivate debating talents. With the aim of "being a filial teenager", we pay attention to social problems and show students' demeanor. Consolidate students' professional ideas and improve their language organization and expression ability and logical thinking ability.
Second, the activity stage:
The first stage of publicity (165438+1October 30th-65438+February 7th)
The head teachers of each class in Grade 5 and 6 organize students to learn the debate process and select players in the class. Students collect relevant materials after clarifying the theme of the debate to prepare for the debate.
The second stage is organized and implemented (65438+February 9)
In the fifth and sixth grades, a debate contest will be held in class, and the best debaters in the class are recommended to team up in the year group; (65438+February10-65438+February 28th) for training.
Statement of the third stage debate
(20xx 65438+ 10 month 10- grade 5; 20xx65438+1October 1 1- sixth grade) After deciding the topic of the debate, each year's group competition teams will draw lots to decide the pros and cons and debate in the lecture hall.
Three. Location:
Four. Person in charge of activity group:
Participating classes: Grade 5 and Grade 6, each group consists of two teams, each with 4 people (male or female).
Verb (abbreviation of verb) competition rules and procedures
(1) time
The audience's total time is 40 minutes:
(2) Process
1, opening statement
A positive debate (debate) (3 minutes)
The other side will debate (demonstrate) (3 minutes)
(Note: When each player has 30 seconds left, the timekeeper will remind him with a short bell, and when the time is up, he will stop speaking with the bell. )
2. Attacks and debates
(1) Positive dichotomy asks whether it is anti-dichotomy or anti-dichotomy; Oppose two arguments to argue three arguments or ask questions.
(The stage of each round of attack and debate is
2 minutes, each question of the attacker shall not exceed 10 second, and each round must ask more than three questions. The defense cannot answer for more than 20 seconds at a time. Don't talk with the bell when the time is up. If both sides have not finished asking or answering questions, no points will be deducted. )
(2) Three arguments are positive, two arguments are negative; The opposing three debates ask questions about the right two debates and the three debates.
(The stage of each round of attack and defense is 2 points, and the attacker must not exceed 10 second per question, and must ask more than three questions per round. The defense cannot answer for more than 20 seconds at a time. Don't talk with the bell when the time is up. If both sides have not finished asking or answering questions, no points will be deducted. )
(Note: The questions and answers are concise, and the respondent must directly answer the questions raised by the questioner. Repeated questions and evasive questions will be deducted appropriately)
4. Summary of attack and defense:
Summary of active debate; (2 points)
A summary of the opponent's offensive and defensive arguments. (2 points)
(Note: It is strictly forbidden to recite the manuscript without referring to the actual situation of the competition, otherwise points will be deducted as appropriate. In the summary stage of attack and defense, each party will have the rest when using it.
10 seconds, the timekeeper will remind you with a short bell, and stop talking with the bell when the time is up. )
5. Free debate
The pros and cons automatically take turns to speak. Each party has a time limit of 8 minutes, and both parties have a total of 16 minutes. The speaker's seat marks the beginning of the other speaker's speech at the end of the speech, and the other debater must speak immediately after it; If there is a gap, the cumulative timing will proceed as usual. There is no limit to the order in which the same debater speaks. If one player speaks more than four times in a row, and one of them does not participate in the speech, points will be deducted. If one party runs out of time, the other party can continue to speak or signal the chairman to give up speaking. Free debate advocates active confrontation, and the party who avoids confrontation more than twice on important issues will be deducted, and the questions that the other party has clearly answered will be deducted appropriately.
(Note: In the free debate stage, when each party has 30 seconds left, the timekeeper will remind you with a short bell; Time's up. End the speech with a bell. )
6. Concluding remarks
A conclusive statement of the four arguments against it; (3 minutes)
A summary statement of four arguments. (3 minutes)
(Note: It is necessary to summarize the overall situation of the debate in a targeted manner, otherwise, points will be deducted appropriately. When each player has 30 seconds left, the timekeeper will remind him with a short bell, and when the time comes, he will stop speaking with the bell. )
7. The audience will ask questions for 3 minutes each.
The audience can ask a question to the pros and cons, and each side chooses a player to answer. This link is carried out after the official competition, which increases the appreciation of the competition and does not affect the result of the competition.
VI. Evaluation criteria
1, group part:
(1) The exam accurately grasps the connotation and extension of the debate, can understand the positions held at multiple levels and angles, has clear arguments, and can effectively handle and resolve our difficulties.
(2) The understanding and discussion of the debate can be expanded in breadth and advanced in depth. The whole debate process is clear and can give people a recursive aesthetic feeling.
(3) refute the question, grasp the key points of the other party, and the question is simple and clear; It makes sense to answer direct questions. Pay attention to face-to-face confrontation with the debater
(4) Team spirit, team members supporting each other, smooth debate convergence, unified direction, both offensive and defensive, and patchwork speeches during free debate, reflecting the "flowing overall consciousness".
(5) The language standard of Putonghua is cadence, fluency and infectivity, which embodies the beauty of Putonghua.
(6) Respect the opponents, the chairman, the judges and the audience in the competition. Behave appropriately and show good moral cultivation. Dare to innovate, dare to show, have the unique style of our team, run through the overall situation.
(7) The image is neat and generous, showing good manners and temperament.
2. Personal part: The judges will give impression points according to the performance of each debater in the whole competition. For reference:
(1) is fluent in expression, thorough in reasoning and appropriate in language;
(2) Ask appropriate questions, answer to the point, refute forcefully, respond quickly, and be humorous.
(3) Typhoon and debate.
(3) Determination of victory or defeat
1. Remove a highest score and a lowest score from the judges' scores, and add the remaining scores to get an average, thus scoring the team.
The team with the highest total score among the four teams wins.
If the scores are the same, the jury will vote separately to decide the result.
4. Remove a highest score and a lowest score from the judges' scores, and add the remaining scores to get the average, which is the score of the contestants. If the scores of the two contestants are the same, the jury will vote for the candidates of the excellent debater and the best debater respectively.
Seven. Judges:
Grade 5 Suppanad Jittaleela Ni Qinghua Bailu Yin Jingjing North
Sixth grade Fang Xia Chen Yuanyuan Yu Lan Zhang Hui
Eight, award setting:
1, judge the best team.
2. The two best debaters; Three players with the best style.
The best six debaters will form a school debate team for further training.
Attached to the debate:
The fifth grade debate: Open book is beneficial/not necessarily beneficial.
Sixth grade debate: to develop civilized behavior habits, self-discipline is more important than heteronomy/to develop civilized behavior habits, heteronomy is more important than self-discipline
;