The top five are equal to the supplement of the team's combat effectiveness. If you choose, you can play and play an effective role. Most of the top five players have a good reputation in colleges and universities and their strength has been affirmed. Generally speaking, you don't have to "gamble" to choose the top five. Unless there is no candidate, maybe the market between players is quite equal, so it is possible to take a chance.
The meaning of "No.1 draft" is different from other drafts. First of all, if the champion is "recognized", like Duncan in 1997, no matter who is missing from the team, he will "choose before talking" and even change the team shape for this champion. Coleman, the No.1 pick in 1990, was selected by the Nets. At that time, the Nets had a pot of power forwards, but Coleman was recognized as the number one scholar, so it was unreasonable not to choose, so he started. Most top champions do well in their first year in the NBA. Since 1990, except Robinson, the big dog in 1994, Smith in 1995, Candy in Orava in 1998 and Martin this year, the other seven newcomers have all been elected as newcomers, so the strength of the champion can't be underestimated.
But isn't the champion necessarily recognized? There may be two or three choices, and even the champion is at a loss. This is what happened in recent years when the rookie's level is not high. This year, both Griffin and Battier have reasons to be top scholars. What if there are no super newcomers? At this time, it is right to choose a "stable" formula and the most guaranteed player. Last year, the Bulls dared not bet on Francis and Odom and chose Brand. Although it turns out that it is almost the same to choose any of the three people, at least it is safe to choose Brand.
What about the other 2-4 picks? That's not necessarily true. Let's start with the order. The second team depends on what the first team does, imagine all the sand table deduction, and then make a decision. Even the teams reached a private agreement not to compete for the best player, but there is also a dark side. For example, in 1998, the Raptors chose first in front of the warriors. The Raptors actually wanted Carter, but when they learned that the Warriors wanted jamison more, they released the news that they were also interested in jamison, and took the opportunity to blackmail the Warriors, choosing jamison first and then trading with the Warriors. Although it is often just a matter of missing a draft or trading a player, we can take the opportunity to solve some team personnel problems and so on … often used in this draft between intrigue and intrigue.