Why is this "Fenna Decision" more exciting than the last eight games? From the ranking, Nadal was the ninth before the game, and Federer was only 17, which was no longer the top two in the world in the Australian Open final in 2009. Followed by age, Federer is even 35 years old, Nadal has entered 30+; Finally, injuries. After the injury in the second half of 20 16, these are just the first two events after their comeback. Even Federer, who has always been confident, said before the game that his goal was only the quarter-finals or the quarter-finals. It is for this reason that almost no one put them in the hot list of winning the championship before the game, and the reason for the ranking was that people once worried that they might meet in advance in the third round.
But the reality finally gave those "pink" singers a loud slap in the face: for these two great champions, their strength and champion heart can never be underestimated by ranking! And the high-quality competition tells us that the wonderful degree of "Fenna Decision" will never lose time! In this Australian Open, it will be impossible for the two players to become possible step by step, and the final showdown will reappear in RodneyGeorge Central Stadium. With Federer's personality, we don't have to worry that he will retire like Sampras, and Nadal will definitely launch a counterattack on his favorite clay court after regaining confidence. The "Fenardi Decision" we are thinking about will be staged in the next Grand Slam final, which may not keep us waiting for five and a half years.
In the past ten years, "BIG4" has been the main theme of men's tennis, and various permutations and combinations of "XX Decision" of four people are the focus of every game, but why is "Fenna Decision" so unforgettable? Most importantly, the two are elegant and elegant, and the other is tenacious. This differentiated play makes the game itself full of appreciation. As the top two greatest players in history, every appearance, especially the grand slam, may directly rewrite the history of tennis. In addition, as a "goat" in the history of tennis, Federer is almost ahead or close to other players, but one-sided behind Nadal's data. It is this contradiction between the two that makes the dispute exist forever and become an eternal topic.
And what about "De Mujue" after "Fennajue"? Deyo and Murray have long occupied the top two places in the world. They couldn't even do one thing, that is, they met in the four Grand Slam finals, but why was the influence of De Mujue always inferior to that of Fenna? First of all, Deyo and Murray have similar game styles, which makes their game more exciting than tension. In addition, the classic of "Fenadiu" comes first, and other confrontations are hard to surpass. Just like when "Fenadiu" replaced "San Adiu", it didn't happen overnight, and "Fenadiu" continued. There is another point that cannot be ignored. There is still a gap between the number of grand slams of the two and Fener. Fener has won 32 Grand Slams, while German shepherd has only 15, less than half of Fener's. In addition, these two people will turn 30 this year.
So I am grateful that the two greatest players in history were born in the same era and presented this classic duel together. Long time no see this time, I believe it won't be long next time.