conditional
1. Divide into two groups, and take the top two circularly within the group.
2. Semifinal A 1 vs B2 A2 vs B 1.
3. Finalists and three or four finalists
***24 games can guarantee that each team will play at least 4 games.
Suitable for schools to support students who value time more.
Fairness is high, but it takes a lot of energy. To tell the truth, it's very troublesome.
Considering the athletes' physical problems, it is difficult to arrange competitions.
Another popular model is the win-lose group model, that is, the lose-lose elimination system.
1. 10 team randomly selected 5 winners and 5 losers.
2. Join the lucky draw group consisting of 3 winners and 5 losers.
3. Continue to use bye-bye to sign 2 wins and 4 losses.
4. Decide the winner, loser, winner, runner-up and loser for the final quota.
5. Finals
*** 16 competition is more fashionable than the first way, and the schedule is convenient to ensure the players' physical fairness (this is very important). If you play 1 day, you can rest 1 day, and you can rest 1 day before the final is settled for half a month.
The easiest thing is to draw lots and eliminate the losers directly, so you won't come here to ask-
Because it is a senior one, there is no seed team, and it is relatively simple to press 46 points and 334 points.
Recommend lose-lose elimination. That's what I used to do.
Okay, good luck.