The leaderless group discussed the problems needing attention in the interview.
Pay attention to the momentum, giving people a sense of generosity and competence.
The fourth quarter without leading group discussion of the specific implementation process
way
1, 5 minutes before the entrance examination, the staff led the candidates into the examination site and asked them to sit at random. There may also be staff members who determine the order of candidates by drawing lots, queue up to enter the examination room and sit in order.
The examiner introduces what the candidates will do in this exam, and then announces the exam rules and disciplines to the candidates.
3. Distribute blank paper and pens to candidates, and distribute scoring forms and employment forms to examiners.
4. The examiner reads the instructions and introduces the tasks and rules of the leaderless group discussion. The staff will distribute the background materials of the discussion to the candidates according to the examiner's instructions.
These instructions are usually as follows:
Hello everyone! First of all, congratulations on your successful passing the written test. Welcome to today's interview. We will take the examination form without leading group discussion, including three stages: personal statement, private discussion and concluding speech. During the whole examination, except for the time reminder, the examiner can't speak, so please answer the questions according to the examination requirements in the question book. Ok, please open the notebook on the desk and start counting.
(II) Formal implementation stage
1, preparation before discussion. It usually takes 5- 10 minutes. After the timing starts, the topic begins to read, thinking about the discussion materials and preparing for discussion.
2. Personal opinion statement. For about 20 minutes, candidates will speak in the order of free arrangement or drawing lots, and each person will speak for no more than 3-5 minutes.
3. Free discussion session. For 40-60 minutes, candidates are free to discuss the discussion materials. You can support opposing others' views and sum up your own or others' views. The examiner does not interfere.
4. Report the discussion results. When the candidate's discussion reaches the scheduled time, no matter what stage the candidate's discussion reaches, the discussion should be stopped immediately. Candidates choose a group representative to report the discussion results reached by the group for about 5 minutes.
5. End. The examiner announced the end of the exam, and the examiner guided the evaluation object to leave the evaluation site.
2, the content of the judges score
(1) Language: speaking initiative, organization and coordination, oral expression, debate and persuasion, correctness of arguments, etc. Different elements have different weights.
(2) Non-verbal aspects: facial expressions, body posture, intonation, speech speed and gestures.
(3) Personality characteristics: self-confidence, dedication, sense of responsibility, emotion and stability.
Chapter II Etiquette, Language and Role Orientation
Section 1 Etiquette
First, static etiquette
Second, the dynamic etiquette
(1) Admission: Stay in high spirits before receiving instructions, and don't look at articles such as headlines and wait for instructions.
(2) Personal presentation stage: facial expressions should be natural, steady and soft, and attention should be paid to eye contact with examiners and other candidates.
(c) During the discussion: don't make your sitting posture lazy because of long time, and don't make small moves such as "dancing".
(4) Conclusion: You only need to pay attention to the examiner, especially the examiner. There are also candidates who can't relax because their "presentation part" is over and their posture is not correct.
Section 2 Language
First, the personal presentation stage.
The first speaker:
1, hello, examiners and team members! Below, I would like to express some superficial views on this issue in order to attract more attention. Please criticize and correct any mistakes. The statement is over!
2. Hello, examiners and players! After careful consideration, I have some preliminary ideas on this issue, and I would like to throw a brick to attract jade for everyone to discuss and express their views!
3. Hello, examiners and players! As the saying goes, "if a worker wants to do a good job, he must sharpen his tools first." In my opinion, the correct solution of the problem needs scientific guiding methods, scientific guiding principles and ideas. I put forward my own views according to such principles and ideas. The statement is over!
(ii) Other speakers
1, hello, examiners and team members! Just now, I listened carefully to some opinions of the previous team members and was very inspired. I have some new ideas to share with you. The statement is over!
2. Hello, examiners and players! Just now, I listened carefully to the speeches of the first few players, and my thinking was clearer. Thank you here. Let me express my opinion below. The statement is over!
3. Hello, examiners and players! Every option in the question is very important, but if you have to choose one (two or three), then my opinion is. The statement is over!
(3) Last speaker
Hello, examiners and team members! I listened carefully to the opinions of the players and was deeply inspired. If my idea can bring you something new, I must admit that I am lucky to stand on the shoulders of giants. Let me state my views and reasons! The statement is over!
Second, the stage of free discussion.
(1) General requirements
1, speak actively, but don't be wordy.
Avoid repeating your speech, otherwise it will be counterproductive. Don't talk too much, try to contribute to the whole group in content and discussion progress.
2. Comprehensive application of various argumentation methods.
Divergent thinking, but not off topic, profound insights, simple explanation, can be demonstrated by examples, storytelling, quotations and so on.
Step 3 keep your mood stable
After a discussion without a leading group, the examiner gave the candidates the impression of being "educated" and "graceful", so the ability of self-emotional control in the free discussion stage is particularly important, so the candidates must pay attention to the exercise of body language, including moderate intonation, moderate gestures, natural facial expressions and correct posture.
(B) the basic strategy of the free discussion stage
1, grab the highlands
(1) Grasp the principle method: Determine the basic principles and methods for solving problems. These principles and methods should be simple and applicable and easily understood by everyone.
(2) Grasp organization and coordination: determine the basic discussion rules, such as limiting everyone's speaking time at a time, reaching an agreement first, and then optimizing the presentation summary.
(3) Grasp the generalization and classification: summarize and classify the opinions of each group member in the independent speech stage, summarize the basic knowledge, and summarize the main differences and arguments. For example, "members, members of our group expressed their views in turn, and what they said was very reasonable." I listened carefully to everyone's opinions and noticed that the opinions of our group members can be divided into the following X types: one is "yes".
Step 2 follow the trend
(1) Extend other people's viewpoints and enrich other people's contents, and you can quote classics and classics.
(2) Raise the theoretical height, stand on the shoulders of giants and see higher and farther.
Step 3 make good use of it
Euphemistically point out the loopholes and mistakes of others, and make up and correct them.
4. Invisible leadership
"The organizer of the process and the executor of the task" is a very lovable role, especially for candidates who are weak in language expression, debate and profound grasp of the topic, you can try to be a "organizer of the process"
The forms of invisible leaders' speeches mainly include the following:
(1) Members, members of our group expressed their opinions in turn, and what everyone said was very reasonable. I listened carefully to everyone's opinions and noticed that the opinions of our group members can be divided into the following X types: one is positive and the other is negative.
(2) Team members, I have a suggestion. In order to improve the efficiency of our discussion, and for all of us to reach an agreement within the specified time, can we divide our discussion process into two stages and stipulate the allocation of time: in the first stage, we can spend X (how long) time, and everyone can fully demonstrate their views and discuss with each other; In the second stage, we can use the remaining time to reach an agreement, brainstorm on the final point of view, and summarize a high-quality answer sheet and give it to the examiner. Team members, do you agree?
(3) Dear team members, both sides' views are very reasonable, but I don't think we can come to a conclusion in the end. I think this problem itself should set a standard.
(3) Possible situations and countermeasures in the stage of free discussion.
1, crash handling. (everyone speaks at the same time, grabbing words)
(1) Highlight self-cultivation: Don't simply be silent, say "after you" politely.
(2) Don't be modest: Then the classmate said, "Thank you for your wonderful explanation. I am deeply inspired. In addition, my opinion is "
(3) When others show humility, say thank you politely.
2. Handling of digressions
When discussing digressions, we should seize the opportunity to point out that digressions may waste time and affect the whole body. "What all the members of the group said is very reasonable, but it has deviated from our topic." I suggest returning to our point of view. My opinion is
3. With more than half time, candidates can seize the opportunity and play a role in controlling the situation.
"Dear team members, our time is over half, but our content discussion is only a little bit, I think it should be."
4. When caught by other players.
Because of immature thinking or a slip of the tongue, it is inevitable to make a slip of the tongue. At this time, we must find a way to get rid of it.
(1) Change the topic: If you are in a passive and unfavorable position, don't pester the original topic, change the topic or seize a weakness of the other party, or attack the other party from a new topic.
(2) Self-mockery: "Gold is not enough, no one is perfect, no one is perfect, and everyone can make mistakes. Thank you for your views on my point of view, but time is limited. Let's take the time to discuss and move on to the next topic. "
5. When other people's views are consistent with ours.
It's best not to say "I agree with this team member." Because the result of doing so is that the examiner thinks that we are followers and echo, and we can only highlight others.
(1) "Just now, this player's point of view is consistent with mine."
(2) Don't respond, express your opinions directly.
6. What should we do when other people's views are different from ours?
Don't rudely and directly say that other people's views are "wrong". Because leaderless group discussion is a process of expressing opinions, and leaderless group discussion itself has no standard answer, so everyone's views are more or less reasonable.
(1) "This player's point of view has some truth, but my point is"
(2) "I listened carefully to this player's point of view, and I think it is very reasonable, but I can't fully agree with it because."
For "
7. Handling when interrupted by others
"Sorry, team member, please let me finish this sentence, thank you."
8. Try not to comment on the views of "specific people"
"I noticed that I just expressed XXX's views in the group or improved the content of XXX. My opinion is "
9. The embodiment of caring for the weak
"Dear team members, I noticed that there is another team member in our group who has never expressed his views. I wonder if I can give him a chance to listen to his thoughts. "
10, someone spoke for too long and the focus was not prominent.
(1) Make rules: "In order to improve the efficiency of discussion, I suggest that each speech should not exceed one minute. Do the members agree? " , you can organize a show of hands; After the adoption, "since we passed this rule through a nationwide democratic vote, each of us has an obligation to abide by it." I think there is no doubt that I have an obligation to remind those team members who have not followed this rule in future speeches. I hope you don't mind. "
(2) Summarize his views in the most concise language:
"To sum up, the core meaning of this team member can be expressed as"
"To sum up, this panelist's views can be expressed in the following aspects."
1 1. When discussing the difficult selection of test questions,
If everyone's views are surprisingly consistent in the independent speech stage, what to discuss in the free discussion stage: discuss the arguments for reaching an agreed view, and discuss the basis for the failure of another view. For example, "Members, I am glad that we have reached an agreement in a short time. I think our next task is still very arduous, that is, to fully and completely discuss the argument and submit a satisfactory answer to our examiner. My argument is "
12, someone prematurely proposed to raise their hands to reach an agreement.
"Voting is indeed a way to solve the problem, but truth cannot be voted. It is impossible to draw scientific conclusions without a fully discussed vote. "
13, I am a minority and have to give up my point of view.
"Dear players, since to discuss, there is no absolute right, there is no absolute wrong. Although I still don't think my point of view is unreasonable, I am willing to give up my point of view in order to take care of the overall situation "; "Although my views have not formed a majority opinion, I am gratified that my views can provide some inspiration to everyone from another angle."
Third, the conclusion stage.
There are two modes to summarize the demonstration: one is that one person in the group summarizes the demonstration; The other is that everyone in the group makes a concluding speech. So far, the first way is the main way. Once the latter situation occurs, we will strive for the first and last place to speak, because only these two can attract the attention of the examiner.
1, representing the choice.
(1) Voluntary
When you are in the majority: "members of the group, we have carefully analyzed and discussed the content of XXX, and I have also listened carefully and recorded it in detail." I want to serve you and recommend myself as a representative of our group to make a concluding speech. "
When you are in the minority: "Dear team member, although my initial view is not completely consistent with your final view, I have been listening carefully and recording it in detail in this discussion, especially I have a deep understanding of the arguments of this view that we have reached an agreement. Therefore, I believe that I have the ability to do this summary report. "
(2) Vote for recommendation
A: Members who want to sum up their speeches on behalf of everyone: "All right, team members, then we will adopt the people-centered system. Raise your hand if you agree with Team X, and raise your hand if you agree with Team X. "
B: Elected team member: "Thank you for your trust in me. In fact, I also believe that these two players can also complete this task on behalf of all of us. "
C: Unselected player: "It's a pity that I didn't serve the team, but I believe this player can also complete this task on behalf of all of us."
(3) Passive coming to power
I suggest you take detailed notes during the free discussion stage in case everyone wants to kill you. Once this happens, we should sort out what we have recorded in detail and turn passivity into initiative.
"Dear team members, thank you very much for your trust in me. I believe I can do this service for you. In this discussion, I made a particularly detailed record. "
2. Opening remarks of concluding remarks
(1) "First of all, thank you again for your trust in me. Hello, examiners. After some warm/active/serious discussions and some unity and cooperation, everyone in our group fully demonstrated their good thinking ability and finally reached an agreement. I will report the results of our discussion as follows: our group's view is that our reason is "
(2) "I am honored to make a statement summary on behalf of all the team members and report the results of our discussion to the examiner."
(3) "Our discussion was conducted in a harmonious atmosphere, and each team member fully expressed his opinions and contributed to the final understanding." "Our discussion was conducted in a harmonious atmosphere and ended after reaching an understanding, during which there were many sparks of wisdom."
Fourth, the additional stage.
Sometimes there will be such a situation:
1, "Who do you think is the best team member in this discussion?"
Answer: "During the discussion, each team member played his own advantages, which was remarkable. Team X has clear logic, profound insight and strong organizational ability. As a party (evaluator), it is not convenient for me to evaluate myself. If I have to choose the best performance among other team members, I personally think it is X, because "
2. "Who do you think is the worst team member in this discussion?"
Answer: "During the discussion, each team member gave full play to his own advantages, but there were inevitably some omissions and even mistakes. As a party, I can't evaluate myself. If I have to choose one person with the worst performance among other team members, I personally think it is X, because "
3. "If only one member of our group could win, who would you choose?"
Answer: "the discussion is pleasant, but the choice is embarrassing, because all team members really have a very good side." As a party, it is not convenient for me to evaluate myself. If only one of the other players can win, I personally think so. "
4. "If only one member of our group was eliminated, who would you choose?"
Answer: "Although I think every player has an excellent side and has contributed to the final understanding, there are winners and losers in the competition, so if a player has to be eliminated, I personally think it is because"
"Tell me about your performance in this leaderless group discussion."
Answer: "It's an honor to serve you in this discussion and contribute to the final understanding. I try my best to keep the discussion orderly and try my best to put forward some views and constructive opinions on the problem. I also regard this discussion as an opportunity to learn from team members. Of course, I must also admit that there are inevitably some shortcomings in me, such as I will actively correct them in the future. "
Section 3 Role Orientation
First, the overall style.
1, sheep pie: seldom speak, taciturn-this role is generally in a weak position, unless it may be in an advantage in recruiting students from the Secret Service.
2. Wolf faction: impatient, obviously wanting to be the master of the overall situation in the process of answering questions, but often not strong enough, but causing resentment and even attacks from other candidates. There is a feeling of bullying, speaking loudly and being aggressive. People who deliberately express themselves in the debate and try to overwhelm others are generally not easy to succeed.
3. Tiger faction: In the discussion, you obviously have the ability to be a leader, but in the whole process, you are not very ostentatious, but waiting for the opportunity, moving accurately and positioning accurately, killing yourself, and eventually becoming the leader of the whole interview. I don't talk much, but I have a strong ability to control the overall situation and good manners, and I am most likely to have an advantage in the interview.
4. Butterfly School: The whole process is quiet, and people pay little attention to it, just like a butterfly, but every speech can attract the examiner's attention like a butterfly, showing many advantages and highlights in content. If you meet sheep pie and wolf pie, it's easy to make a blockbuster.
Second, the specific role
1. Viewpoint advocate: A person who puts forward a clear and insightful viewpoint or innovates and perfects his own viewpoint on the basis of summarizing others, with excellent content and quality. For example, it is proposed to choose a tramp to escape first, because he has the lowest value.
2. Followers of opinions: follow other people's opinions, but have new innovations in arguments. It is thankless to just repeat other people's views and arguments. For example, the second candidate added the argument that vagrants not only have strong ability to survive in the wild, but also have stronger ability to resist hunger and thirst than ordinary people under special circumstances.
3. viewpoint supplement: improve the existing viewpoints and further process them on this basis. For example, on the basis of the above two, the third person suggested that the tramp fled first and then the remaining few people could just form a small team that is most conducive to survival, such as: What is A doing? B just do what;
4. Organizer of the process and executor of the task: actually, it is the leader and coordinator of the group. Candidates with weak theoretical foundation can try to break through this role.
Third, the role of not doing it.
1, don't be a silent person.
2. Don't be a long-winded person: it is taboo for a person to monopolize the right to speak for a long time, make a long speech, or repeat it many times.
3. Don't parrot: Don't always say that I totally agree with X, which will only deepen the examiner's impression of X candidates and will not do you any good.
4. Don't be a wallflower: headstrong, opinionated, simple and arbitrary.
5, don't be impatient: control your emotions, you can't directly say who is wrong during the speech, to avoid unnecessary trouble.
6. Don't put on a show: when a show of hands forms a consensus, you still stick to your point of view and don't give in.
7. Don't be a spectator: it is mainly manifested in rich expressions and many movements in the whole process. Is a wait-and-see attitude, committed to watching everyone "quarrel." It seems to be out of the group, thinking that it is none of your business. Give the examiner an unstable, practical and single-minded impression. Therefore, "moderate tension" and "focused thinking" are necessary.
8. Don't be rude: Show disdain when other team members express their opinions, such as shaking their heads, pouting and contemptuous eyes, and always interrupt others' speeches. This gives people the impression that they lack the minimum quality and education.
● Frequently asked questions of candidates
I. Etiquette
1, when answering your own questions, be sure to say hello to the examiner and team members, so that the first impression on the examiner is very important.
2, eye contact should take into account the examiner and team members, especially when discussing freely, team members are your main discussion object. There may be two main reasons for this problem: first, I don't know much about this form of examination, but I just show myself to the examiner and ignore my peers; Second, I pay too much attention to what I express and forget that I am in a group.
Second, language expression.
1, should have a loud voice, fluent language, moderate speech speed, clear and powerful, and can't have too many mantras.
Third, the content
1, pay attention to time control.
2, the thinking space should be more open, and we can try to associate some current social hot phenomena (for example, when we solve the problem of poor teachers of migrant workers' children, we thought of introducing fresh graduates, which not only solved the employment problem, but also strengthened the teaching staff; For example, we can think of a fair education and a harmonious society.
3. Dilemma: When discussing, don't be too aggressive, especially if you can't directly point out who you are talking about, which will easily lead to a rebound. Even if you want to refute other people's views, you must have sufficient arguments and perfect reasoning.
4. Dilemma: When you are in the minority, if you want to make your point of view powerful, you must never drag a person who performed badly in the presentation stage, which will undoubtedly push yourself to the wall.
5. Dilemma: On the strong side, it is better to get high marks, so everyone should strive to be the better one on the strong side.
6. Strategy: express your views+summarize the focus of the debate between the two sides+other members of our party should respond positively.
7. Note: What we discussed cannot be fabricated out of thin air. What we quote must be suggested in the title or existing in the current laws and regulations. Never make it up out of thin air. (Otherwise, it is likely to become a showstopper, and neither side is flattering)