In addition to the above institutions, starting from this year, the enrollment scale of local colleges and universities should be strictly controlled within 5% of the fresh graduates of provincial higher vocational colleges (specialties). [detailed]
The Ministry of Education said that this move is to strengthen the management of "college-upgraded undergraduate". Whether it can achieve the expected purpose of the Ministry of Education is still unknown, but the discussion caused by the notice has aroused concern. Some people clap their hands and say yes, while others dismiss it as a ghost policy. Is it good or bad? Please participate in the discussion >>
Restrict "upgrading from college to undergraduate",
The intention of the Ministry of Education is good.
This will help to ensure the quality of undergraduate courses.
There is a great market for this form of education, because it can meet the needs of students who want to go to undergraduate courses but can't meet the requirements. Many colleges and higher vocational schools have taken advantage of this practice, made many promises and enrolled a large number of students. Students who graduate in this way have bachelor's degrees and some have degrees, but it is difficult to guarantee the quality of graduates because of their poor foundation and lack of formal undergraduate education. [Details] [Participate in the discussion]
Strict control of undergraduate courses is also strict control of arbitrary charges.
"College entrance examination" is a way for candidates whose college entrance examination scores have not reached the undergraduate level, so the relevant schools charge high tuition fees. This high tuition fees further stimulated the relevant schools to recruit a large number of students who did not enter the undergraduate line of the college entrance examination, and the enthusiasm of buying and selling diplomas, but also increased the burden on students. Selling a large number of diplomas also has quite adverse consequences for some prestigious schools, and the image of their prestigious schools has certainly been damaged. [Details] [Participate in the discussion]
Undergraduate education should not be flooded.
Netizen: Undergraduate education itself is a high starting point and should not be flooded. If China wants to improve the overall quality of its citizens, it should rely on strengthening education outside the undergraduate course, not on giving more people the title of "undergraduate course".
After the suspension of "upgrading from college to undergraduate", junior college students can continue their studies through other channels, and the statement that they have broken the road to study cannot be established. [participating in the discussion]
Higher education may disturb the order of competition.
Netizen: Some "college-upgraded" students get undergraduate diplomas by paying high tuition fees, which leads to the proliferation of undergraduate diplomas. However, China has fallen into the misunderstanding of paying one-sided attention to academic qualifications and diplomas and neglecting practical ability. The competition between "college-upgraded" students and ordinary college undergraduates may disturb the normal competition order. [participating in the discussion]
Restrict "upgrading from college to undergraduate",
Decision-making of Ministry of Education
College students can only be college students forever?
Many students with good college entrance examination potential have the desire to continue their undergraduate studies after their junior college studies are completed. Is it fair if these desires are easily cut off by this notice?
Since students have a desire to continue their studies, the education authorities should listen to their opinions more. Moreover, under the current college entrance examination mode, suspending "upgrading from college to undergraduate" will undoubtedly strengthen the educational color of "one exam for life", which is unfavorable to the subsequent talent training. [Detail] [Participation in Discussion] Netease News. 163.com
The dream of saving the country from the curve is shattered, and the road to job hunting is bumpy.
Judging from the employment situation of college graduates in recent years, the average employment rate of junior college students is nearly 20 percentage points lower than that of undergraduates. In this employment situation, more and more college graduates hope to improve their academic qualifications and broaden their knowledge through "undergraduate education" in order to obtain ideal positions. Now, the "college entrance examination" has been closed, and the dream of saving the country that college students had high hopes for has also been shattered. [Details] [Participate in the discussion]
Can you not eat it just because it is defective?
At present, there are some phenomena in the process of upgrading from college to undergraduate, such as disorderly enrollment, arbitrary charges and unclear procedures. However, this cannot be used to deny the "undergraduate course" itself. If the education from junior college to undergraduate is regulated by banning, it will be like blocking rather than thinning, which can eradicate all kinds of unhealthy phenomena, but at the same time it will also close the hope of junior college students. [Detail] [Participation in Discussion] Netease News
The sudden change in policy is overwhelming.
It is conceivable that for college students, they can't predict the "sudden change" of education policy at all. I believe that many students have decided to strive for further undergraduate education opportunities when they choose to study in a junior college, but now they can only do nothing. [participating in the discussion]
"Undergraduate" needs to be standardized, and "one size fits all" is not desirable.
"College to undergraduate" is also an important means of internal circulation in colleges and universities. Colleges and universities should decide whether to hold general junior college education, instead of adopting a "one size fits all" approach as it is now; The Ministry of Education has the right to take various measures against unqualified universities, instead of letting key universities and private universities in the "985 Project" indiscriminately implement the same policy. [Details] [Participation in Discussion] Network
Education policy should establish credibility.
Education policy should leave a buffer period between announcement and implementation. In other words, even if the Ministry of Education wants to stop the general education in some colleges and universities, it should be aimed at the students who entered the junior college in 2006, not the junior college students who are already in school. Only in this way can the credibility of the education policy be established, and students can make their own choices more confidently according to the policy, instead of deciding their own destiny like "drawing lots". [Details] [Participate in the discussion]
You can also visit/special/000113b0/education060220.html.