As a language art, competition has a long history and its function is self-evident. The following is the summary model essay of the debate I collected. Welcome to reading.
Summary of Debate Competition 1 Carry forward the spirit of legal system, strengthen students' legal concept, improve students' critical thinking, logical thinking and oral expression ability, and enrich campus cultural life. The debate contest on "Life and Law Debate" planned and sponsored by the Ideological and Political Teaching and Research Section officially started in early February of 12.
I. Overview of the Debate Competition
There are eight debating teams in 19 classes (except excellent athletes' classes) in our college, and 32 students participate in this debate. The debate lasted for two weeks and was divided into two stages: the preliminary contest of 65438+February X and the final contest of 65438+February X. Finally, the champion team 1 team, the sub-army 1 team, the second runner-up, the best debaters and the excellent debaters were decided. As the first debate competition held by the college, this activity was well received by the students, which greatly stimulated their enthusiasm for participation and achieved great success. It has had a wide influence among students and attracted the attention of all the leaders of the college.
The content of this debate reflects the characteristics of popularization and popularization, and the topics of debate are all legal issues closely related to the lives of ordinary people or of great concern to ordinary people. The activity decided opponents, debates and games by drawing lots. The judges of this activity are teachers from the ideological and political teaching and research section of the Ministry of Public Affairs and the liberal arts teaching and research section.
In the competition, the debaters were furious and tit for tat, which reflected the debaters' full pre-competition preparation, superb debate strategy and rebuttal ability. The wonderful rebuttal on the court won warm applause from the students outside the court. According to the current laws of our country, the judges judge the right and wrong debates of the participating teams and make legal explanations, and evaluate the overall performance of the participating teams and debaters. Their wonderful comments also added icing on the cake to this debate.
Two. The results of the debate competition
(A) improved the comprehensive ability of the contestants. Debate contest is an all-round investigation of debaters' ability and level. In the process of debate, debaters need all kinds of knowledge and abilities to conquer and defeat their opponents in fierce debates. To this end, they fully display themselves on the stage and their abilities are improved unconsciously. First, the thinking ability is improved. Secondly, language expression is more artistic. Third, the knowledge structure is more complete. Fourth, the ability to respond to emergencies has been strengthened. Fifth, courage is exercised.
(2) Give students a vivid law lesson, so that students' overall discrimination ability is enhanced and the overall cultural level of the campus is improved. As the saying goes, "the more the truth is debated, the clearer it becomes." The debate is aimed at the issues that students care about. The theme of the debate is quite close to students' lives, practical and gives students something to say. Both sides of the debate tried their best to analyze the problem comprehensively and deeply, showing all the students two aspects of things, while the audience launched intense thinking in the conflict of ideas, finally understood the essence of the problem, learned to analyze the problem, improved their ability to distinguish, and laid the foundation for effective action later. The rich debate atmosphere has also improved the overall cultural level of the school. Students can discuss more elegant topics, learn to convince people by reasoning, and will not swear rashly, let alone fight, which is much more civilized.
(3) Enhance class cohesion. Debate contest is not only a display of individual talents, but also an excellent group can stand out without the tacit understanding of four small groups and the support of students in large group classes. Before the game, the monitor and the study committee actively and orderly organized the whole class to look for information, cheered for the players during the game, applauded and cheered for them, and shared the joy of victory and the pain of failure after the game. The competition brought them closer, more like a family.
(d) increase teachers' understanding of students. This activity mainly invited leading guests and teachers, and the teachers had a more profound understanding of the students ideologically during the debate.
Third, it is worth thinking about.
Generally speaking, the debate has achieved good results. However, due to the hasty time preparation and the relative lack of experience in hosting the competition, there are also some minor problems in the whole organization process, such as imperfect auxiliary facilities, relatively insufficient guidance for students before the competition, and a bit of confusion in awarding prizes. To this end, we will take effective measures to correct the shortcomings in our future work and make the debate more successful.
Summary of Debate Competition II: A friendship debate between the Information Department and the Finance and Taxation Department was held at J/KOOC-0/-/KOOC-0/in our school at 20xx/KOOC-0/October 30th/KOOC-0/8: 30. This debate is fortunate to invite seniors and sisters to serve as judges. The information detachment composed of positive debaters and the fiscal detachment composed of negative debaters have launched a heated debate around the topic of "which is more important to pick up or put down".
The competition is divided into six parts. From the moment the chairman shouted, the stadium became tense and intense. The debaters on both sides were tit for tat and were furious. You come and go, but you don't lose your manners. Kan Kan spoke. Especially in the most exciting free debate session, the atmosphere at the scene quickly warmed up and wonderful applause continued. Finally, the on-site comments of the judges also benefited everyone present, especially the debaters, especially the sentence "Debate tests whether the defense can be grounded and logical." The real winner is not whose argument is impeccable, but who can persuade the other side better. "In the end, the competition ended in the victory of the opposing side, and the judges said that the two sides with murderous eyes won the honorary title of the best debater.
The branch friendship debate not only exercised the contestants' debating ability and cooperation ability, but also improved their thinking reaction speed and communication ability, enhanced their language organization ability and adaptability, promoted exchanges between branches, consolidated friendship, and showed the elegance of students in information branch and finance and taxation branch.
The third chapter aims to enrich the extracurricular life classes of college students, enliven campus culture, cultivate the unity, competition and enterprising qualities of contemporary college students, improve their eloquence and communication skills, and reflect their spiritual outlook. Xiang Ying Inspirational Association sent a strong team to participate in the Xiaoxi Debate Competition and the Debate Competition organized by the Speech Association, and finally achieved excellent results. Now, the debate is summarized as follows:
I. Mode of activities
This activity is open to the whole school. Students can participate in this debate in the name of clubs, colleges, classes and individuals. In this debate, the elimination system was adopted, and the teams with excellent performance were selected to enter the next round until four teams were selected to enter the finals. Unfortunately, Xiang Ying Inspirational Association was eliminated in the semi-final and missed the final.
Second, the activity time:
20XX 65438+ 10/9 to 165438+ 10/5.
Three. Location:
Preliminaries: C 102, C 106, C 104.
Semifinal: comprehensive C 102, comprehensive C 106.
Final: Yixin Building
Four. Participants:
The whole school
Verb (abbreviation for verb) debate procedure
The competition procedure consists of five parts: presentation, argument, summary of offensive and defensive arguments, free debate and concluding speech. First, the first and second arguments are the opening arguments, explaining our basic position, logical framework, theoretical basis and factual materials. Use the most refined language, followed by tit-for-tat offensive and defensive warfare and colorful free debate, followed by the concluding remarks of the four debates, and finally the audience asked questions. The competition procedure is mainly composed of "debate" and "debate", which not only provides sufficient space for the two sides to have a wonderful discussion, but also fully demonstrates their meticulous logical framework and provides a stage for the two sides to confront each other head-on. On the one hand, the audience questioning stage can arouse the enthusiasm of the audience, on the other hand, it also enhances the interaction between the debate and the audience, making the atmosphere more active.
VI. Effect of the activity:
Achieve the expected results, progress smoothly and be a complete success.
Seven. Reflections on activities
In the debating competition, the debaters of the association fought against each other with their agile thinking and eloquent eloquence, and finally, they successfully entered the semi-finals, although they were eliminated from the semi-finals and missed the championship. However, the debaters' performance is still very good, showing the elegance of a new generation of college students, and at the same time being exercised. We should understand that there is not only this debate on the road of life, but also many debates in the future. I believe their performance will get better and better in the future.
Summary of the debate 4. Clever eloquence and agile thinking ability are two talents that contemporary college students must possess when they leave school. In order to cultivate and improve the students' eloquence and thinking ability in our college, and at the same time provide a stage for students to show their self-style, and cooperate with the Youth League Committee of our college to run the first Youth League Culture Festival well, the Chen Jiang Forum specially organized this campus debate competition in conjunction with the Life Science Association. After more than 40 days of intense and meticulous planning and organization by the organizing committee of the debate competition composed of Chen Jiang Forum and Life Science Association, the campus debate competition finally came to an end in the praise and applause of the students, and the weeping willow team composed of four players from the Chinese Department stood out and won the championship of this campus debate competition. Compared with the past, this debate has its special significance:
First, as an important part of the first group culture festival, it is directly led by the College Youth League Committee, which makes the activity more cohesive;
Secondly, it is the first debate competition jointly held with other brother groups (Life Science Association) after the establishment of Chen Jiang Forum, which embodies the new image and mental outlook of our group. The success of this debate also shows that the students in our college have strong vitality;
Third, after the competition, a group of excellent debaters stood out and made good preparations for the selection of debaters for our group debate team. It should be said that this competition is quite successful. As the direct organizer of this competition, the secretariat of our group now makes the following brief summary of this competition:
First, debate
The content of the debate in this competition is quite extensive, but it is closely related to daily life, with both life interest and the flavor of the times, so that debaters can have something to say in the debate. This debate involves current affairs, campus issues, kindness and kindness, and environmental protection issues. On the one hand, the life of debate gives most students room to think. On the other hand, the debate is closely related to the needs of the times and has a strong sense of the times. This makes the whole debate scene appear splendid, vivid and beautiful, and it can arouse people's thinking after the game, giving people an intriguing meaning and depth. It can be said that the accurate setting of the debate topic has laid a good foundation for the success of this debate. However, the extensive content and strong sense of the times also require debaters to have profound knowledge accumulation and extensive social contacts from another side.
Two. Procedural aspects of the debate
The mode of this competition basically follows the Singapore mode, but according to the actual situation, the procedure has been slightly adjusted. Due to the limitation of time, the speaking time of some programs was shortened appropriately, which made the whole debate more compact and the competition more interesting. The competition procedure consists of six parts: coach's speech, debate, attack and defense, free debate, concluding speech and audience's questions. First of all, the first and second debates started with arguments, and made clear our basic position, logical framework, theoretical basis, factual materials and so on. In the most refined language, followed by tit-for-tat attacks and colorful free debates, followed by the concluding remarks of four debaters, and finally the audience asked questions. The setting of the competition program gives consideration to both "debate" and "theory", which not only provides sufficient space for both sides of the debate to have wonderful discussions, but also fully demonstrates their meticulous logical frameworks, and also provides a stage for both sides to engage in angry words and face-to-face confrontation. On the one hand, the audience questioning stage can arouse the enthusiasm of the audience, on the other hand, it can enhance the interaction between the debater and the audience. However, some problems were exposed in the competition. In the attack and defense stage, many debaters don't know much about the rules of attack and defense, which leads to considerable confusion, and the setting of attack and defense questions is not clever enough, which makes the whole attack and defense stage slightly dull and not exciting enough. In the stage of free debate, the question and answer sides were not targeted enough, and each said his own words from time to time, and there were not many wonderful confrontations. Especially in this competition, because the other group who participated in this activity didn't have enough debating experience, the students they sent as judges directly took away the scores, left the competition site without unified scores, and didn't announce the results on the spot. Such a phenomenon must not appear in future competitions.
Third, the style and level of debate.
This debate pays great attention to the style of debate. Generally speaking, the debate style of the contestants is quite good. In addition to paying attention to the beauty of language, we should also pay full attention to our own image and demeanor to feast our eyes on the audience. Some debaters are eloquent, and some debaters are calm and atmospheric, which is quite general. Some debaters were smart and lively, laughing and cursing, which opened the eyes of the audience and the judges. However, there are also some problems. Some debaters don't pay attention to respect each other and are slightly suspected of personal attacks on each other. We will attach great importance to this work in the future. The contest fully demonstrated the debater's alertness and meticulous logical thinking, and both the debate stage and the rebuttal stage reached a climax, which was very exciting. Generally speaking, this debate is both an argument and a discussion.
There are often some unexpected ideas in the debate field, such as exaggerated personalized language, allusions and witty remarks, which are both masculine and feminine, and make the audience deeply feel the profundity and wit of the debater.
Fourth, the atmosphere on the field and the reaction of the audience.
Another highlight of this debate is the audience. The audience was very lively, and the times gave warm applause. In the stage of audience questioning, some questions are typical and targeted, and some viewers are eloquent when asking questions, which involve all aspects. The scene is very warm, making the atmosphere tense and interesting. Moreover, it also puts forward some problems with great social value and worth thinking about, which is realistic to some extent, and also points out the problems that the debaters on both sides have not noticed in the debate field, which makes the discussion of the debate more profound.
Five, thinking after the game
A debating competition brings us not only the result of the competition, but more importantly, the debaters form an inseparable fighting group in the process of organizing the competition, which embodies the spirit of division of labor and cooperation. Yin Hou, a student of Chinese Department 1 class, said: "Through the debate, I learned to cooperate and learn to be calm." One sentence represents all debaters. Someone once said that debate is the gymnastics of wisdom. Indeed, in the debate, fierce ideological confrontation and spiritual collision of ideas can make us appreciate the beauty of wisdom. Debate is not a simple debate, but a debate about cultural background, personality beauty and wisdom. First of all, it requires debaters to have profound cultural background and rich theoretical foundation, that is, profound knowledge. Secondly, we should have a sensitive response, a good attitude and personality charm. Debaters should have a refined style of debate and be gentle to convince people, rather than arguing with each other. In the process of debate, debaters also learned how to respect their opponents and pay attention to their words and deeds, giving people an elegant feeling. The situation on the debate field is changing rapidly, which also requires the debater to have the ability to adapt. Some debaters did quite well in this respect. They can make full use of their debating skills and wisdom, and they are very polite to their friends. This is what we should advocate and learn. In the future, we will strengthen the training of debaters in this respect and achieve a qualitative leap.
Although the game was over, it did bring us a lot. There may be regrets and failures in the debate, but it is precisely this that makes us learn the style of "debate". There are also some problems in this competition, such as the debate style and logical framework during the competition. It is necessary to rationally analyze and summarize, correct the shortcomings in this process, and constantly improve. This debate competition has also received strong support from the Youth League Committee, the Federation of Youth League Organizations, tutors and judges. They also made great efforts and contributed to the smooth progress and complete success of this competition.
In short, we will carefully analyze and summarize this competition, learn from experience, and strive to make full use of strengths and avoid weaknesses in other aspects of work in the future, accumulate experience, improve deficiencies, and take it to the next level.
Summary of Debate Competition 5 20xx 165438+ 10/3-14 In the evening, Rainbow Station of School of Information Engineering successfully held "Pony Debate" in Mingyuan 1203 and 1205 classrooms of Weishui Campus. All the members of Pony Class in School of Information Engineering and all the members of classes in 14 participated in the debate. Wang Miao, Secretary-General of Youth League Committee of School of Information Engineering, Fu Xiankai, Chairman of Student Union of School of Information Engineering, Lei Shengqiang, Wang Huaizheng, Chairman of Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Association of School of Information Engineering and Zhou Yucheng, Vice Chairman of Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Association of School of Information Engineering, were invited as judges of this debate.
The competition kicked off with the opening remarks of the two hosts and warm applause from the audience. The competition is divided into two parts, with a total of 14 teams participating. The competition is divided into five stages: debate stage, refutation stage, qualitative debate stage, free debate stage and summary statement stage. The pros and cons are pairwise PK, and each has four debaters to reply. During the competition stage, the atmosphere of the stadium was tense and intense, and the debaters of both sides quoted classics, linked ancient and modern times, and fully demonstrated the debate views. In the stage of free debate, the game became hot. The debaters of both sides firmly grasped each other's loopholes, and pressed each other step by step, pushing the atmosphere to a climax again. The debater had a wonderful debate on the stage, and the audience applauded again and again. After the debate in the first half and the second half, the on-site judges made wonderful comments respectively.
The game * * * promoted to the eighth team and participated in the semi-finals.
This debate competition has cultivated students' teamwork ability, improved students' thinking ability and expression ability, and strengthened the academic atmosphere of the college. At this point, the debate has come to an end, and the follow-up competitions are being prepared in an orderly manner.
Summary of the Debate Competition 6 I. Background of the event
In order to welcome the grand opening of Hebei Universiade in Xingtai University next year, it will provide a platform for eight major societies to practice their eloquence.
Second, the theme of the event
Combine with the eight major societies to exercise eloquence and create an auditory feast for the debate.
Third, prepare in advance
1, our activity department has worked out detailed and feasible competition plans for the preliminary, semi-finals and finals.
The activity department subdivides each task into each officer, and each officer prepares every step carefully and responsibly before the game. * * * With the improvement of general debate affairs.
3. Our department coordinates the propaganda departments of various societies, our agency and the network department to do a good job in publicity, and the officers do a good job in site layout and equipment are in place.
4. All societies actively participate in the registration, and the Propaganda Department will vigorously promote the contest.
Fourth, the activity process
1, preliminaries:165438+1October 22nd, venue: Gong * * * Teaching Building 204. 206。 208。 2 10 classroom. After fierce and cruel competition, four of the eight teams stood out and presented a wonderful debate and confrontation for everyone.
2. rematch:165438+1October 25th Venue: Gongx * * Teaching Building 2 10. The four teams that stood out launched a more exciting debate, which was more mature and intense than the first time. At the same time, the applause from the audience was more enthusiastic, and the debaters were all passionate, like soldiers fighting on the battlefield. In the end, under the professional comments of the community judges, the combination of incense and hunter finally entered the final with deuex.
3. finals. 165438+129 October, location: Gongjiao Building 3 10. The two teams that entered the finals are ready to go, and the venue is full. The confrontation between the masters pushed the game to a climax and really created an unprecedented debate. Every player attacks and refutes each other confidently and passionately, especially in the most wonderful free debate stage, the debate is interpreted to the extreme. The applause continued outside, and finally, under the careful and fair judgment of the judges, the positive combination of incense defeated the opposing side. In the end, the game came to a successful conclusion.
Problems in verb (abbreviation of verb) activities
1, the publicity of the debate is not enough, and many people miss the registration because they don't know the relevant rules of the debate.
2. In the preliminary stage, most players didn't pay enough attention and preparation, so they couldn't state their views without writing, which directly reduced the excitement of the competition.
3. The preliminary publicity notice was not in place, resulting in an unsatisfactory audience.
The contestants don't know much about the rules of the debate, which leads to chaos at the beginning of the preliminary round.
The seventh part of the summary of the debate is to deepen the understanding of computer-related knowledge of computer majors and promote students to think about professional knowledge and knowledge in the computer field from different angles. On the afternoon of April 24th, 20 16, the computer technology innovation club successfully held the computer culture festival debate competition in 5A404. The debate contest revolves around two controversial topics related to computer science, with teachers Tong and Zhao as judges.
In the afternoon 14: 00, the debate officially began. The debate revolved around topics such as "whether artificial intelligence can surpass human beings" and "which is more promising for ios or Android". In the debate, the pros and cons hold their own words and give strong arguments to prove their views. The two sides did not give in to each other, especially the free debate session was more exciting. After each debate, the judges and Mr. Zhao will make meaningful comments, point out the advantages and disadvantages, express their views on the debate, and give guidance on how to cut into this debate.
After the heated debate, the staff of the computer technology innovation club counted the teachers' scores and awarded the popularity award, debater and debate group respectively. Two teachers who came to the scene took photos with the winners, and the debate officially ended with applause.
This competition has enriched the extracurricular life of computer majors, broadened their horizons in the computer field, improved their critical thinking ability, exercised their eloquence and cultivated their resilience. At the same time, it also makes them realize that they should consider the related software and hardware products in the computer field from different angles, which improves their sensitivity to the development prospect of computers.
The Computer Technology Innovation Club held the Computer Culture Festival Debate Competition this time, aiming to encourage students to actively understand the knowledge in the computer field, encourage students to carry out computer technology innovation, and improve the activity of computer-related majors in our school.
;