2. First of all, the nonstandard supervision mechanism is the main reason for the formalization of the supervision mechanism. China's supervision mechanism is basically unilateral, and the initiator and implementer of the supervision mechanism are integrated. In other words, the supervision in practice has not formed procedural rules. News supervision is only the work of journalists, and the source, organization and release of news mainly depend on the working ability of journalists or the ability of news organizations. News itself is not a tool for ordinary people to monitor. Therefore, journalists sometimes take the overall situation into consideration and are unwilling to report or publish the consequences of events that are not conducive to the government or even to large enterprises. The government supervision mechanism also has this tendency. Of course, the supervision mode of this authority model has changed, such as the regulation of the petition system for the government to receive letters and visits, but overall, it has not changed fundamentally. For example, procuratorial organs, public security organs and auditing organs have no relevant institutional norms on how to deal with people's suggestions and whether to adopt them. There is still serious formalism in the government's social supervision. Attach importance to the handling of major affairs and weaken the usual supervision. Mainly rely on the exercise of authority to start the supervision process, rather than relying on mobilizing the masses to start the supervision process. In the process of the procedure, there is also a lack of ordinary people's participation, so it is difficult to avoid being "captured" by the subject of supervision.
Secondly, not paying attention to the protection of the supervision right of ordinary people is also one of the reasons. In the existing system in China, the supervision right of the common people is not guaranteed by the system. The supervision behavior of ordinary people is more of an obligation than a right. Ordinary people even need to provide their own expenses for reporting illegal activities, and even pay a heavy price for it. Of course, some local governments have begun to pay attention to reward and compensation for reporting behavior, but it has not been standardized and institutionalized. Is it an institutional reason that such a major illegal act occurred in broad daylight but no one reported it? ! Therefore, it is imperative to attach importance to the supervision behavior of the people.
Furthermore, this is related to the disharmony between supervision mechanisms. In China, people's attention to the supervision mechanism mainly focuses on two points: emphasizing the diversification of the supervision mechanism. For example, people's general understanding of dispute resolution mechanism is that diversification of dispute resolution methods is an inevitable trend, and insufficient attention is paid to the coordination problems brought about by diversification of dispute resolution mechanism. In practice, this may lead to mutual shirking of responsibilities among supervision mechanisms, and even lead to a situation in which supervision mechanisms are fragmented, thus causing "litigation fatigue" among the people. In this case, what's more, it has nothing to do with your "private affairs"? Outsiders don't know the illegal amount of Sanlu enterprise. Don't employees of Sanlu milk powder know that the company has violated the law? Is "one monk carries water to eat, two monks carry water to eat, and three monks have no water to eat" prominent in the existing supervision mechanism in China?
3. Recently, I often see some posts about discussing democracy, a large part of which are questioning and criticizing the current democratic system in China, and some irresponsible abuse. Here, the fool also talks about the democratic system in my heart.
First of all, what is democracy? The concept of democracy we are using now evolved from the Greek words "people" and "rule or authority", which originally meant "people's rule". Herodotus, a Greek historian, used this concept for the first time in history, referring to the political system and practice of Athens, a Greek city-state. From this point of view, "democracy" is a political concept from the beginning. As a political system, democracy in Athens is a system of citizen autonomy: the citizens' assembly has supreme power, and its power scope includes all public affairs of the city-state; All citizens directly participate in legislative and judicial activities; Officials are elected by direct election, lottery and rotation. Officials don't enjoy any privileges like ordinary citizens.
Most people that fools see on the Internet think that democracy means voting and expressing opinions in the election of state leaders and related affairs. However, China's current democratic system is the people's democratic dictatorship, that is, the people of the whole country elect deputies to the National People's Congress, and then the deputies to the National People's Congress vote on important state affairs. For a populous country like China, this system is understandable. Then, the multi-party governance that many people worship is democracy. I think this is a misunderstanding. Can multi-party governance represent democracy? Can a country's political system embody democracy? I personally don't think so.
The ruling idea of our party is the people's democratic dictatorship. It can be said that since the founding of the People's Republic of China, we have been striving to become a democratic country again. From the National People's Congress to the local people's congresses, we can clearly understand that China is a democratic country from the Constitution and relevant laws and regulations. Although many people are dissatisfied (there are indeed some dissatisfaction), it is a fact. For example, some people who have cars and houses (even several villas), have a certain position in the society and have a considerable right to speak are always arguing that they do not enjoy democratic rights and human rights, and demand that many parties take turns to govern China. There are still some people who can only maintain three meals a day, and their lives are very embarrassing, but they feel that they live in a democratic country. Why? Personally, I think the key to a democratic system lies in people, and in everyone's understanding and recognition of democracy in society.
China has a population of 654.38+03 billion. I don't think it is possible to have a democracy that will satisfy 654.38+03 billion people. Everyone has desires, and everyone's desires are different. I can only say that it is an idiotic dream to realize a democratic system that will satisfy all the 654.38+0.3 billion people in China. Look at America, the democratic country that many people dream of. You can guarantee that 400 million Americans are satisfied with their democracy, and their democracy and human rights will be perfect. Here, I want to say that people who believe in this legend are either stupid or have ulterior motives. (Specific examples abound, so I won't list them here. Friends who want to know will find it online. Our country has been founded for 60 years, and the construction of democracy has never stopped. Regarding * *, I want to say that the construction of democratic politics in Socialism with Chinese characteristics is inseparable from the national conditions and restricted by historical laws. To take the road of Chinese democracy, we must follow the law of democratic political construction. After all, we experienced more than two thousand years of feudal rule, followed by imperialist aggression. Building a democratic system on this basis is not as simple as lip service.
General Secretary Hu Jintao said: "The key to measuring whether a political system is democratic depends on whether the wishes of the overwhelming majority of the people are fully reflected, whether the rights of the overwhelming majority of the people to be masters of their own affairs are fully realized, and whether the legitimate rights and interests of the overwhelming majority of the people are fully guaranteed." He further pointed out that "what kind of political system a country implements must be adapted to the national conditions and nature of this country." Personally, I think what the general secretary said is very reasonable. Democratic construction is a century-long project, and I think it is no exaggeration to say that it is a light-year project. There is an old saying in China that it is hard to say that everyone wants to satisfy the 654.38+300 million people, even if they can't do it for centuries. The most ridiculous thing is that some people think that you will have personal freedom only if everyone has personal freedom; Only when everyone has freedom of speech can you have freedom of speech; Only when everyone is not discriminated against because of nationality, race, gender, religious belief, age, physical disability and other reasons, you will not be discriminated against. If a country is not strong, it is strange that others do not discriminate against you. You want to be free. Go to the Peach Blossom Garden. There will never be such a place in the real world.
As long as there are people, there are contradictions and endless desires. Whether a country is democratic or not depends not on its political system, nor on how many political parties are in power, but on everyone's desire. For people with strong desires, if you give them everything, they will still say that they can't enjoy democracy without human rights. For people who have no strong desire, as long as they can have a good time every day, they feel very democratic. So I think democracy is everyone's attitude towards life, their responsibility to society, and their care for others, not a poor vote in their hands.
China's democratic construction is promising. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the government have been working hard to develop China into a democratic country. Although some rubbish in the party has tarnished the party's image and damaged its reputation, it would be sad if we lose confidence in the current system of the country. The Central Committee has been carrying out the democratic system reform in China. I hope that the people of the whole country will be tolerant, supervise the party and the state, fulfill the obligations entrusted to citizens by law, and jointly build a beautiful home.