The Committee didn't play any role, but existed in name only. The provisions on civil rights in the Code have not changed the actual situation. However, we can see from here that this law is not a concession to the poor, but deprives them of their civil rights. The central content of this law is two things, namely, the change of election method. There are two meanings here: First, the nobles are more equal. Who is elected and who is not elected. It is not decided by the aristocratic meeting, but elected by citizens by lot. If the property conditions are qualified, you can be an official as long as you draw lots. Secondly, the middle class has certain rights. Although the high property standards ensured that the highest power in Athens was in the hands of the nobility, the nobility could not completely monopolize the official position. Middle-class citizens in Athens can be elected as middle-and lower-level officials in Athens by drawing lots. This not only adjusted the internal relationship of the nobility, but also adjusted the relationship between the nobility and the middle class, and expanded the ruling class to a certain extent.
Of course, this reform did not change the oligarchic system in Athens, nor did it change the aristocratic system in Athens. The broad masses of lower-class civilians still have no political rights. They are the "people" of Athens, not the "masters" of Athens. The Code of delacour only changed the old customary law into words. Although it limited the tyranny of the aristocracy to a certain extent, it essentially maintained the dictatorship of the aristocracy. Far from meeting the requirements of the broad masses of civilians, it intensified the contradiction between civilians and nobles.