How to evaluate Nadal's 20 16 Australian Open exit in the first round?

In this game, it can't be said that Nadal played absolutely badly, but that Vodasco played well and fought the game. We can get a glimpse from the following three data:

First of all, in the deciding set, Nadal started with a 2-0 lead and maintained the break point in the subsequent Vodasco serve.

According to Nadal's previous statement, Vodasco may have to repeat the mistakes of 2009.

But the fact is that Nadal's ability is indeed declining, and Vodasco is really excellent in both forehand and backhand service.

Second, in sending and receiving data, Nadal's 74 sending and receiving scores also overwhelmed Vodasco's 64 sending and receiving scores.

Considering the close first goal rate (Nadal 64% vs Vodasco 6 1%) and the overall suppression of Nadal by Vodasco's first goal speed (Vodasco 196KMH vs Nadal 18 1KMH), and the fact that Vodasco has as many as 20 aces,

Nadal actually has a strong performance in hair extension.

Thirdly, in terms of winning points and unforced errors, Vodasco scored as high as 90 winning points, but unforced errors reached 9 1.

As for Nadal, 37 winning points compared with 38 unforced errors show that Nadal is often the passive side in the whole game.