China will qualify for the World Men's Basketball Championship. China was -3 1 and Puerto Rico was -8, which was also 2 wins and 3 losses, but China qualified.

Before the game, China's qualifying situation became the focus of discussion. Because China, Slovenian and Puerto Rico are all 2 wins and 3 losses, and the three teams add up to 7 points, the relationship between victory and defeat is very complicated, forming a chain. China defeated Slovenia, Slovenia defeated Puerto Rico, and Puerto Rico defeated China. At that time, FIBA failed to give very clear rules, and even many basketball (basketball news, basketball talk) experts could not explain clearly who was the third and fourth in the group. Because FIBA once explained that if the points are the same, compare the winning and losing relationship between the two teams first, and if the winning and losing relationship forms a chain, then compare the winning and losing ratio between the two teams. According to this statement, China should rank third and Slovenian fourth in the group. But in the end, China ranked fourth in the group and Slovenian ranked third. Why are they all 2 wins and 3 losses, with a total score of 7 points, while the Slovenian team lost to China is ahead of the China team? FIBA issued a statement. "If the points of the two teams are the same, then compare the winning and losing relationship between the two teams first; If the points of the three teams are the same, considering that it is possible to form a series of situations, it is not a winning-losing relationship, but a comparison of the gain-loss ratio of the three teams. " A person in charge of FIBA said, "Comparing the ratio of gain and loss points is not the same as comparing the net win points. Under normal circumstances, those with high gain-loss ratio will definitely get more points, but if the gap between teams is small, the relationship between them will be different. "

According to this regulation, China scored 165 and 167 in the final match against Slovenian and Puerto Rico, with a score ratio of 0.98802. The Slovenian team scored 165 against China and Puerto Rico, but lost 1, with a score ratio of 1.0475. The worst team was Puerto Rico, which scored 172 and lost 177 against China and Slovenian teams. The score ratio is 0.9765,438+075, which is only 0.065,438+0 worse than China.

It can be seen that Yao Ming has always stressed how important it is that we need to fight to the last minute. Regardless of winning or losing, no matter how obvious the score gap is, if China loses one point in a certain game, or his opponent gains one more point, it may be fatal to China's final qualifying prospects. We should also thank our opponents. Slovenia had previously won Puerto Rico 90-82. If Slovenia wins a few points less, maybe Puerto Rico will qualify.

According to the ranking rules formulated by FIBA for this World Championships, when three or more teams in a group have the same record, the winning relationship between these teams with the same record is calculated first, and the team with the highest winning rate ranks first. If the winning percentage is equal, the ranking will be determined according to the winning or losing points of the opponent's game (total score divided by total lost points).

As China, Slovenian and Puerto Rico all win and lose, a series of situations have emerged. Then according to the ranking rules mentioned above:

The total score of China against Puerto Rico and Slovenia is (87+78)/(90+77)=0.98802.

The Slovenian total score for Puerto Rico and China is (90+77)/(82+78)= 1.04375.

The total score of Puerto Rico against China and Slovenia is (90+82)/(87+90) = 0.95438+075.

From the comparison of the total scores just now, it is obvious that Slovenian ranks first among the three teams with 1.04375, China ranks second with 0.98802, and Puerto Rico can only rank third because it is 0.0 1 less than China. Counting the United States, which won five games, and Italy, which won four games 1 0, the ranking of the teams in Group D is: the United States is the first, Italy is the second, Slovenia is the third, China is the fourth, Puerto Rico is the fifth and Senegal is the sixth.

Defendant: Wu Tiantian-Bachelor Degree 17 8-24 2 1:39.

Revision reply: Wu Tiantian, your revised reply is as follows: The integral rule is closed.

According to the ranking rules formulated by FIBA for this World Championships, when three or more teams in a group have the same record, the winning relationship between these teams with the same record is calculated first, and the team with the highest winning rate ranks first. If the winning percentage is equal, the ranking will be determined according to the winning or losing points of the opponent's game (total score divided by total lost points).

As China, Slovenian and Puerto Rico all win and lose, a series of situations have emerged. Then according to the ranking rules mentioned above:

The total score of China against Puerto Rico and Slovenia is (87+78)/(90+77)=0.98802.

The Slovenian total score for Puerto Rico and China is (90+77)/(82+78)= 1.04375.

The total score of Puerto Rico against China and Slovenia is (90+82)/(87+90) = 0.95438+075.

From the comparison of the total scores just now, it is obvious that Slovenian ranks first among the three teams with 1.04375, China ranks second with 0.98802, and Puerto Rico can only rank third because it is 0.0 1 less than China. Counting the United States, which won five games, and Italy, which won four games 1 0, the ranking of the teams in Group D is: the United States is the first, Italy is the second, Slovenia is the third, China is the fourth, Puerto Rico is the fifth and Senegal is the sixth.