Seek the evaluation criteria for selecting cost firms! ! !

Scoring standard 1. Evaluation method: 1. The comprehensive evaluation method is adopted in this bid evaluation, that is, on the premise of meeting the substantive requirements of the tender documents, after comprehensive evaluation according to the evaluation criteria and various factors stipulated in the tender documents, the bidder with the highest total score in bid evaluation will be regarded as the winning candidate of the corresponding bid section. 2. Each member of the Bid Evaluation Committee shall independently evaluate and evaluate the technical part of the bidding documents of all effective bidders in the form of scoring (the calculation result shall be rounded to two decimal places). Statistical summary of judges' scores (except price). If the number of judges is less than 5 (including 5), the score shall be directly calculated by arithmetic average; If the number of judges is more than 5, the arithmetic average score shall be calculated after removing the highest score and the lowest score. 3. If there are two or more bidders with the highest total score in a bid section, the bidder with lower bid price will be given priority as the candidate for winning the bid section. If the bidding price is the same, the notary office will determine the winning candidate by drawing lots. Two. Price: (the price weight is 30 points) The lowest bid price that has entered the bid evaluation procedure and meets the requirements of the tender documents is the bid evaluation benchmark price (which shall not exceed the purchase budget price), and the full mark of the price is 30 points. The price scores of other bidders are calculated according to the following formula: bid quotation score = (bid evaluation benchmark price/bid quotation) x price weight value X 100 (price weight value is 30%) III. Product and material quality (42 points) 1, main material brands (at least including plate, hardware, paint, etc. ); The judges scored between 4~ 10. 2 products and main raw materials, steel plate, powder and other inspection reports. (Within the validity period): 65438+ 0 point for each item provided, with a maximum of 6 points; 3, the advanced comparison of production level (output, manufacturing technology, testing methods, etc. ) 4 points 4, samples 20 points, mainly from the appearance, materials, technology and other aspects by the judges in 2~20 points; 5. Supply and delivery date: 2 points for meeting the bidding documents; Four. Comprehensive evaluation of the company (18 points): 1, comparison of company reputation (9 points) (1) national registered trademark certificate of the bidding product brand (2 points) (2) annual financial audit report certified by a third-party accounting firm (1 copy 1 point, 2 copies, 2 points) The highest score is 2 points (3) Enterprises that set industrial standards for iron and steel products (1 minute) (4) Famous brand enterprises above the prefecture level (including prefecture-level cities) (1 minute) (5) Famous furniture enterprises above the provincial level (including provincial level) (1 minute) (6) Pay three gold for employees. Since 2005, the bidder has scored 65,438+points (the original sales contract must be provided in the tender, otherwise it will not be scored) (2) the annual sales certificate of container shelf products from 2005 to now issued by the audit department at or above the municipal level (including prefecture-level cities) (2 points) (3) comparison of the standardization and completeness of the tender documents (1 point) (0.5 point will be deducted if the original and copy of the tender documents are not indicated on the cover). ≥5 years, 2 points; ≥3 years, 1 minute, others will not be scored. (2 points) 3. Introduction of installation plan and maintenance team (2 points) 4. Maintain the commitment of response time and completion time (2 points will be given for the shortest time and guarantee, and the rest will be deducted accordingly) 2 points and 5 points. Preferential terms (maximum score 3 points) Compare whether there are other preferential conditions and technical advantages. If there is any, it will be graded by the judges at their discretion, and if there is no, it will not be graded: the bid price exceeding the procurement budget price will not enter the comprehensive evaluation of the tender and will not be awarded.