The mode of surrounding meals has become the mode of western food. 10 people order 9 dishes. What do you think?

The mode of surrounding meals has become a western-style mode. I think it is good to order nine dishes for 10 people first. From all aspects, because we are just having a meal after all, there is no need to make it so grand or so good. Isn't it fun for friends to eat? There's nothing wrong with it. In addition, you can eat more if you are not full, or eat more rice and less. There is no need to be so serious. I'll order as many dishes as I want, and no matter how many people eat them, it's not good for me, so we must know how to form such a habit when eating, because we know that this habit is not bad, but we haven't formed it ourselves.

As a member of the public, what we need to do is to save as much as possible, because we are a relatively understanding generation now. Maybe some people just want to save face and so on, but we still have to save it when necessary, because we also need to know the current situation of our country.

Not only our own country, but also our global grain production reduction is certain. This year is a special year. Whether to be thrifty or not is a big problem. If it is not too big a problem, this practice will be popularized.

I think this form is worth popularizing. Most of us should understand that there is no such thing as a free lunch, especially at this moment of global grain reduction. We can't say that our country has no problems at all, at least our country is better. Our situation is better now, and it may not be affected too much, just like the pattern of our peripheral meals has become a western-style pattern. 10 people order 9 people's dishes first, which is very beneficial to our current social and economic development. Of course, many times we also need to consciously save ourselves.