Science should represent wisdom, and the purpose of establishing "science" is to tell people that there are some facts in the universe, to dissect many things that people don't know truly and sincerely, and to solve the mysteries that people in the world can't know.
Everyone knows about religious circles. Buddhism emphasizes practice and does not commit crimes. The word Islam means "peace" in Arabic. Christianity stresses "love" and "holiness" and demands to stay away from crime. Common sense tells mankind that "religion" is the product of "morality", and the moral norms guiding human ideology can completely live in harmony. However, Darwinism changed the meaning direction of "science". It is simpler than ordinary people to find the existence of unknowable facts and conduct in-depth research and exploration-throw them away. Whatever you can't see, what you can't think of, and what you can't put in the laboratory, no matter how real, has been shelved. Or religious belief, superstition or idealism, a broom swept into the dustbin and entered a dead end. You don't go in yourself, and you don't allow others to go in. Therefore, the expected "science" lasted for more than 150 years. Until today, there will be so many unsolved mysteries in the world. Now many so-called "science" has become a child's play. Darwin's "science" only did what farmers did, and completely lost its value. Today, it seems that transsexuality and theology are at odds, and the concept of "Darwin" has become synonymous with science above all else; I have always thought that science is called not talking about justice, and anything that can't get into the laboratory can't be called "science". However, the struggle philosophy "evolution", an unprovable belief that will never enter the laboratory, has become a "science" that is not allowed to criticize. A bright and tidy room, because the dirty light bulb makes people's eyes blurred and can't see the truth clearly, which brings trouble and grievances to the real high-tech achievements.
Why did "science" and "religion" become sworn enemies? Why can't there be morality if there is science? Why do science and religious beliefs, especially the Christian church, become incompatible today?
Obviously, a kind of "science" without morality cannot be called "science" from the perspective of human truth.
So what debunks "natural selection" and makes it impossible is anti-science? China has many valuable classics; For example, Zhou Gong, Ma Yixiang, Huangdi Neijing, etc. After years of exploration, the author has also confirmed that more than 90% of them are accurate through many historical records. So what is its connection basis? Can't these prove that "natural selection" is a religion? Anti-science?
"Big Bang" theory: the universe was born from nothing, so this "nothingness" can only be an incomprehensible point that does not actually exist, but it is actually a matter with infinite energy level, which is completely inconsistent with our existing theories and concepts, but it is an irrefutable scientific conclusion;
The deepest Gaglin crater on the surface of the moon is 186 miles in diameter and at least 700 miles in depth, but in fact the depth of Gaglin crater is only 4 miles, which is only 2% of the diameter. This is not true in scientific theory, but it is true in fact;
Thousands of years ago, in the era without advanced tools, there were huge stones 10 miles away, and there was no road or water transportation in the depths of the tropical jungle. A pyramid with a height of 70 meters and a stone of 10 ton is impossible for human beings today. Is that impossible? But the facts do exist.
Can't there be a theory of whispering if there is scientism? Is creationism anti-scientism? Can't there be Christians without Darwin? Questioning whether Darwin's "evolution theory" is anti-science? The debate about "evolution" within the scientific community is no less than that between atheists and Christians. However, the scientific community and atheists can never prove that the spiritual world does not exist.
When it comes to in-depth scientific research, we will naturally encounter many problems that span three-dimensional space perception, which cannot be explained and proved by the existing scientific level and means of human beings, but they do exist. Can't say this is a religious belief, not a science.
1963 John, winner of the nobel prize in physiology or medicine? Sir Eickel has always believed that "man is a wonderful compound composed of tangible and intangible spirits."
Materialists who believe that even if they can't see, they don't exist believe that some behaviors or actions made by hands or feet are guided by immaterial brain thinking. If you want that girl to be your wife or that young man to be your husband, first of all, your brain will always produce immaterial "love". Because the invisible "love" pushes the tangible body to create words or forms that attract each other. Never let your tangible body pounce on people you don't know without saying a word, in order to achieve the purpose of completing your spouse; If such a person will be diagnosed, why is it called? So what kind of title will be diagnosed as a scientist who only recognizes tangible things and denies intangible things? You can't really call it an ape! Besides, this kind of invisibility is only for the naked eye.
Today, with the discovery and further study of dark matter and dark energy, it is believed that the scientific community is fully capable of discovering invisible matter and life in the spiritual world of higher intelligence. However, science is to explore and study the existing substances in the universe, and it will never break through the universe and become the only truth. There are many things in the universe that can't enter the laboratory, whether tangible or intangible. With the existing scientific level and means of human beings, many problems perceived as "crossing three-dimensional space" cannot be explained, but they do exist. What can't be solved can't be solved, so to really solve the mystery of the world, we must start with understanding religion. At least understand some papers about religious beliefs, and then combine, compare and study them with historical reality, with hardware and software.
The frontier of science and technology is in the spiritual field, not the physics and chemistry of matter. When science is dissolved in religion (as it is said today), it is when science is highly developed and the mystery of the world is solved.
There is a famous saying: "The end of science is the beginning of faith". Dr. Robert Jestro, the founder of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Space Research Institute of the United States, said in the book "God and Tianmen Research": "For a scientist who lives by rational forces, the ending of this story is like a nightmare. He has been climbing the mountain of ignorance ... When he climbed the last stone, he was welcomed by a group of theologians who had been waiting there for countless centuries. "
Millikan, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics, said: "Because the universe is beyond the scope of scientific knowledge and beyond the reach of human wisdom. This area where human wisdom cannot be seen is a religious area. ..... The wisdom of human beings is limited, and we can't fully understand the ultimate mystery of the universe. ..... Real modern science should learn to be humble and obey the creator ".
1865, the British Science Society published a Declaration on Religion and Science signed by 6 17 experts, which is now in the Bordelon Library in Oxford. The declaration reads as follows: "We express our views on the relationship between science and religion as natural scientists. At present, some people in the scientific community doubt the authenticity and correctness of the Bible because they seek scientific truth. We are deeply sorry here ";
"We believe that the existence of God is written in the Bible on the one hand and in the universe on the other. Although the forms are different, they will never conflict with each other ";
"We should remember that physical science is still not perfect, but it is still making progress. At present, our limited understanding seems to be blurred in the mirror ";
"Now many natural science scholars don't study the Bible, but rely on its incomplete laws and little knowledge to doubt and oppose it. This attitude cannot but make us regret ";
"We are convinced that the only purpose of every scientist studying nature is to clarify the truth. However, the results of their research found that the Bible and science are in conflict, and its essence is a misinterpretation of the Bible. Don't rashly and arbitrarily think that his conclusion is correct and the records in the Bible are wrong. Instead, we should adopt an objective attitude, be calm, listen to God's instructions, and be sure that the two must be consistent, and we must never be paranoid that there are conflicts and differences between science and the Bible. "
Qianjiang evening news's article (2008 10 version C/19) said: "Science is the ability of human beings to understand and transform nature; Religion in a broad sense has existed in primitive society, which is even older than civilization. Therefore, science and religion in a broad sense are also the two major forces that have brought mankind to today. " At the end of the article, Professor He, a famous philosophy department of China Renmin University, clearly pointed out: "Neither science nor religion advocates destroying and plundering nature. The Bible says that God left this world to repair, not to destroy. People should be guarded and managed, not plundered and squeezed. There is also a basic view in Christianity: God is the master of the world, and human beings are only the "stewards" of the world; The housekeeper can't pretend to be the master and take whatever she wants. She can only do her duty and take good care of the master's property. It is on this basis that we say that religion and science can engage in dialogue and then cooperate to jointly promote the well-being of mankind. "
The famous Mr. Pan Shiyi once said in the forum "Building Social Civilization and Understanding the Truth of Human Beings": "There is only one truth in the world, and there is only one truth. No matter how we discuss it, as long as we are in the spirit of truly exploring the truth, we will eventually achieve the same goal. Find the only truth, find the truth, reach agreement and unity, and there will be no harmony without truth ";
"The purpose of science is to explore the truth of things, discover the laws between things and discover the truth. The way adopted by science is "discovery", and the purpose of approaching the truth is achieved by discovering the laws between things. The form of religious belief is "revelation". If we only recognize the scientific way of "discovery" and not the religious way of "revelation", people will surely fall into the quagmire of extreme materialism, without faith and direction. There are many phenomena in the world that are difficult to explain by scientific methods. For example, "love" and "happiness" are hard to express clearly with any scientific formula and theorem, but they do exist. Understanding the world in two different ways, science and religion, will be closer to the truth and our hearts. If you only focus on exploring the truth by scientific methods, you will ignore your inner feelings and spend a lot of energy and time observing the outside world and looking outward; If we only seek truth through revelation, we will meditate and sit still all day.
Prayer, focusing only on your inner feelings and inspiration from magical power, will ignore the existence and changes of the outside world. Science and religious belief are two wheels of a car and two wings of a bird, which are indispensable. Only when they develop in a balanced way can they achieve harmony. In the past century, the development of science and technology has made rapid progress. In this case, people should have firm beliefs and restrain themselves with higher moral standards. We can't ignore the influence of this magical belief power on our progress. "
Sabatier, a French chemist and Nobel Prize winner, said: "I think it is unreasonable and useless to advocate the opposition between science and religion. Those who advocate this argument are probably unclear about religion and science. "
A saint named Abdul Bach said a passage, which clearly explained the relationship between science and religious belief. He said: "If religious beliefs and opinions are contrary to scientific standards, then he is only superstitious and illusory, because the opposite of knowledge is ignorance, and ignorance leads to superstition. There is no doubt that correct religion is the same as science. If we find that a problem conflicts with the truth, we can't believe it, and it will have no result except confusing and shaking people. "
Kant, a famous scholar, once said: "There are two things that amaze me. One is the greatness and wonder of the universe, and the other is the peculiar role of conscience in people's hearts. People can see the wisdom created by God everywhere as long as they look up at the size of heaven and earth and look down at the variety of categories. Similarly, as long as people reflect on themselves and listen to the voice of conscience, they can also understand God's guidelines for guiding people to do good. These two things are enough to help people who are honest and face life seriously to ask God seriously.
Einstein, the father of the atomic bomb, once said, "Science without religion is lame, and religion without science is blind." ""love
Sheng Di's biography writes: "One day, some reporters asked him to allow him to publish his anti-religious remarks in the newspaper. He said angrily: people with philosophical thoughts always have to accept the facts that they have to admit. Judging from the performance of all things, the universe is really a great achievement of the will of the Almighty. If I deny the existence of supreme power, I will despise my own knowledge. Science and religion have the same roots, and there will never be any conflict between them. I believe in my Lord's teaching that people and things are led by a leader. The fate of the world is dominated by a supreme person. "He also said:' I am such a person. I admire all engineers in the world, but I deeply admire the greatest engineer-God.' "
The French modern chemist Mill said in G Koenig's article "Light on the Road": "The more inventions I see, the more problems I cause, and the more naive I feel. ..... In front of this natural scene, you can't help creating a wonderful cosmic mystery in your mind. You can't help feeling that there is a creator above this universe. He is omnipotent and good, and he is the creator of the material universe and the spiritual world. "
"Can a real scientist be a Christian at the same time?" This is a question put forward by L Langer, a modern French astrophysicist and a famous authority on elementary particle physics. His answer is yes. He said, "I am a man of faith. I have never lost my religious belief."
The inventor of quantum theory, a famous German physicist, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics, and one of the greatest scientists in the 20th century, wrote "Memoirs of a Report", which said: "No matter where we look, or where we think there is a great distance, the cosmic order and the religious God are linked. There is no contradiction between religion and science; But for the biggest problem, I totally agree. Religion and science are not mutually exclusive; On the contrary, they are mutually complete, as if they are conditionally complementary. "
In his later years, Newton wrote 6.5438+0.5 million words of theological works to prove the existence of God. Who can say Newton must not be a scientist?
Thousands of years ago, the Mayans used a more accurate calendar than we do now. The huge unit "Alaudon", which is only needed when measuring interstellar distance, can be used for timing. Their scientific and technological level is obviously higher than that of today's world, and their wisdom is also obviously stronger than that of modern humans. They all believe in God and worship him devoutly. How do we compare with them?
Stephen gould, the authoritative scientist of Evolution, said: Most scientists are hostile to religion because their research objects do not involve the scope of theological concern; He also said: Buzanszky, the most famous authority of "evolution" in the first century and the most orthodox Christian in his life, proved that "evolution" and religion can maintain harmony.
Judge overton admitted that creation in a broad sense does not conflict with the evolution of science;
Yang Zhenning, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics, once said: Science and religion will come together one day.
In the preface written by Frank Press, president of the National Academy of Sciences, for 1984, the booklet Science and Creativity, Opinions of the National Academy of Sciences, he clearly pointed out to which of his compatriots: "It is wrong to think that' evolution' represents an irreconcilable conflict between religion and science.
Dr. Horton said: "Science can make people wake up from the superstition of worshipping the created things and worship the creator who created the universe."
Professor An Yanshi, a famous professor who promoted the global upsurge of China calligraphy and China culture, found that in fact, human civilization comes down in one continuous line, theology is the source of science, the mother of science is theology, and science is the son of theology. Now human beings explore theology by experiment, knowing that the world is science and the unknown world is theology. Science has also confirmed that we know very little, and most of the universe is unknown dark matter.
In order to attack theology, some people put the hypothesis of "evolution" on behalf of science and religion, which is really ignorant. As early as 1955, Zhou Enlai, the great man of Bandung Conference, pointed out: "The era of provoking religious disputes should be over." In fact, if you look at the Bible, you will immediately know that "micro-evolution" itself is in the creator's plan. It is not a new discovery of Darwinism, but people look for chicken feathers as arrows.
Bible Psalm 127 1: If the Lord hadn't built the temple, the builders would have wasted their efforts. It would be even more wrong if we only use "evolution" to eliminate the influence of the Bible on human beings and replace it with human assumptions. Morality, knowledge, culture and science in the world are all inspired by the creator's Bible. Unless you leave this world and hide alone in a closed vacuum.
As early as when talking with Christians, the great Zhou Enlai made it clear that "no one can try to destroy religion artificially." The Bible has been slandered, attacked and destroyed for thousands of years, but today? It's really true. Some so-called "scientists" have not realized the nature of the universe or just become question marks at the end of the study of skins, so they start from their own cleverness, make up some lies, or make some ignorant assumptions for fame or for some purpose, which harms themselves and misleads many innocent people. Some don't know, some are intentional. As a scientific researcher or a person who borrows the name of scientific research, whether he has an attitude or not is the basic knowledge and morality that a person should possess.
Creator allows plants and animals to reproduce in far more ways than we know "evolution". Never find a little evolutionary form allowed by the creator to mutate into an anti-creator "evolution theory" and deny the possibility of the creator in other ways. In Genesis chapter 1 of the Bible, two words are particularly noteworthy in the process of creation by the creator: "occurrence" in section 1 1 ~ 12 and "reproduction" in sections 20 ~ 22. Of course, we can't put forward that the Bible supports Darwin's "theory of evolution" based on these two words. On the other hand, we can't deny the creator's method just because we oppose Darwin's "evolution theory".
Bible Genesis 1: 28: God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth and govern it;" : ……"。
Richard Dawkins, a famous British zoologist, discovered after years of research that DNA is selfish, and all its purposes are to survive and reproduce.
Genesis 1: 22: God blessed all this, saying, "Be fruitful, fill the waters in the sea, and let birds multiply on the ground." If you pay a little attention, you will find that any species has a strong function of "reproduction", which already includes "evolution" That is to say, the chef has added fermentation raw materials to the flour, and after reaching a certain temperature in the steamer, it will naturally expand into big bread.
The Bible also gives people the mission and strength to study science. Genesis chapter 1 section 28 of the Bible says ... to govern this land, we must also govern the fish in the sea, the birds in the air and all kinds of creatures on the ground. " With a little attention, you will find that everything in the world, even a little air, is made by people and serves people. Therefore, human beings must understand biology and the universe in which human beings live. This is "science". Science has affirmed the origin of the universe, which just fulfilled what the Bible says: "In the beginning, God created heaven and earth …".
With a little thought, it is not difficult to find that there is a powerful advanced intelligence living in this universe. To deny this is to deny one's ancestors, because there is no one who is not left by his ancestors. If you insult heaven and earth, you insult your ancestors, father and mother. People who scold their parents are always spurned.
The fifth generation of the Yellow Emperor is Yao. Historical Records records: "Yao has the wisdom of understanding God, loves heaven and fears the God of all things". Confucius once praised: "Great and lofty Yao! Regard the sky as the biggest, and take it as an example with all your heart! Broad and frank, people can't describe it! "
If we use the viewpoint of "evolution", the next step of mankind is not gradual evolution, but "intelligent life" in the blink of an eye. Just as the recognized fossil record in the long history shows: many creatures suddenly become extinct at the same time, and then all kinds of creatures appear at the same time in an instant. According to Darwin's "strong is survival, weak is death", it depends on the creator, because people are weak no matter how strong they are. A pitifully weak mosquito can kill people, and the strongest person will die in the end, so it is not qualified to talk about strength.
Are those who know how to find the true meaning of life ridiculed, or those who reject the truth show their stupidity and narrowness? Of course, there are also many unjust things done in the name of religion or the Bible in history, which are also spurned by people. The days of centralized power of corrupt and autocratic Catholicism really left a shadow on history, which is why Darwin's "evolution theory" quickly became an anti-Bible atomic bomb and quickly occupied the world. But we can't say that this is not good because of the lack of certain religions. This road was crossed by robbers. This road is a robber.
Professor An Yanshi said: Britain and the United States, which believe in Protestantism, have the fastest development; Most Nobel Prize winners believe in Protestantism, and later the West overtook the East.
Any religious belief involves moral concepts, especially the Bible emphasizes that "goodness" is "love", which is free from crime and is an advanced moral concept. If there is science, there is no morality. What kind of science is this? What is "science" that is divorced from the sacred "holiness, goodness and love" and has no morality but only interests? Isn't it also using "scientific" means to produce problem milk powder and problem eggs for profit?
Didn't the special car lock decoder also use high technology? Didn't Hitler kill people with advanced "science"? China is a society ruled by law. Using high-tech "scientific" means, taking money from the national bank for nothing, only waiting for legal trial.
It is necessary for people to use science to guide themselves, but they must know what science is. Never let your stupidity take the place of science and tie yourself to death in the ground. The real murderer is often himself.
As a religious leader, you should also understand science. The Bible is a book, the universe is also a book, scientific argument is a discovery, and archaeological investigation is also a discovery. It is also the requirement of this book and the need of life to find the factual basis of the universe through scientific research and archaeological investigation and let people know the universe and themselves better. What is known in the Bible may be discovered by science. It's just that people may make mistakes and commit crimes sometimes. It is inevitable that the ego will appear and misunderstand the truth. The only authority is the Bible and the universe. Because I know that everything is not in human reason and form, but in mind and honesty.
Ignorant science is great superstition, and wise faith is true science.